Talk:Lemur

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured articleLemur is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on December 25, 2010.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 12, 2010Good article nomineeListed
May 18, 2010Featured article candidatePromoted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on April 5, 2010.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that lemurs (pictured) exhibit female social dominance?
Current status: Featured article

Semi-protected edit request on 29 April 2018[edit]

The Pleistocene was not in the Paleogene as you can see in the box on top of article please fix the shadow because it shows Paleogene or fix the title from Pleistocene to Paleogene 71.254.13.155 (talk) 10:37, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done for now: Please explain what you mean when you say "fix the shadow because it shows Paleogene". I understand that the article should say Pleistocene and not Paleogene but it doesn't say Paleogene once except "To further complicate the issue, several Paleogene fossil primates from outside Madagascar, such as Bugtilemur, have been classified as lemurs" which seems appropriate. Waddie96 (talk) 16:44, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Etymology section[edit]

What is the rationale for having etymology and rationale for name as two separate sections? Would it be better to combine the two sections into one titled "Etymology"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by AngstyHippo (talkcontribs) 14:52, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Phylogeny update?[edit]

I've begun a discussion at Talk:Taxonomy_of_lemurs#Horvath_v_Orlando_v_newer? UtherSRG (talk) 13:43, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lead concerns[edit]

@Hemiauchenia, I noticed that with the edits you've made to the lead, the last paragraph is now quite long, and includes some information redundant to the rest of the lead (e.g. describing Archaeoindris twice). Would you be able to go through the lead to ensure it conforms to MOS:LEAD at an FA level? Sdkbtalk 01:48, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. Hemiauchenia (talk) 01:53, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]