Talk:Fédéré

France Mid‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: European / French C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	European military history task force
	French military history task force

Untitled[edit]

I've done my best here with about an hour of online research. Further research is needed. There is probably a lot more to be said, and I'm not sure I'm dead right on all of what I've written. -- Jmabel 05:37, Jul 17, 2004 (UTC)

http://mapage.noos.fr/mlopez/chronologie_generale_1792_2.htm would seem to confirm my understanding on the most common use of the term. -- Jmabel 06:05, Jul 18, 2004 (UTC)

Unfocused[edit]

What is this article about? From one section to the next, it seems to be about the multiple meanings of a term over time; the evolution of a French military unit; or a series of celebrations. If I had to pick just one, it seems to be more about the multiple meanings of a term than anything else, and if that's the case, it should be transwikified to Wiktionary, because Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Conceivably, the 1792 section could be spun off as its own article, and everything else sent to Wiktionary. Mathglot (talk) 10:29, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]