Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Presymptom

Presymptom was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete

Presymptom

I can't find any solid facts in this article and it seems to be going nowhere. silsor 07:12, Nov 30, 2004 (UTC)

• delete. It's original research--somebody's pet theory about strategies for health management. --[[User:Tony Sidaway|Tony Sidaway ^Talk ]] 07:36, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. Bogus research. --Gene s 09:42, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• A mix of pseudoscience and common sense. Smells of snake-oilery to me, probably someone wanting to boost sales of some "herbal remedy" he's marketing by establishing verisimilitude. Delete. Inky 20:02, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• failing any references or any actual information, I'd say the this article is a Presymptom of more articles-in-need-of-deletion, and we should expend some deletion resources now before the illness hits. Pedant 01:51, 2004 Dec 5 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.