Talk:Jimmy Corrigan, the Smartest Kid on Earth

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Jimmy Corrigan, the Smartest Kid on Earth article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Chicago Low‑importance

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comics Mid‑importance

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Diagrams[edit]

It might be hyperbolic to say that the diagrams take hours to decode though one could probably look at them for several hours, or whatever unlimited amount of time is desired and be able to extrapolate new things out of it. I'd say that it takes as at least as long as the time needed to read a page of text. -- ruinedmap

Plagiarism?[edit]

should anything be included here about the accused plaguarism of this character by Family Guy creator Seth McFarlane?

See Criticism of Family Guy. Miranda 13:36, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

im inclined not to add it, as it seems like its not a full claim of plagiarism, but may just be a coincidence. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 03:50, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup[edit]

i rearranged text to give it a better flow. the article is already refed a little bit, just wasnt structured properly. each award is listed in the article for that award, and may be enough, assuming the award articles are refed. I left content that could likely be refed, so it still needs more citations. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 03:50, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]