Talk:Hammersmith & City line

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Good articleHammersmith & City line has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 1, 2013Peer reviewReviewed
February 12, 2013Good article nomineeListed
Current status: Good article

Opened when[edit]

Why is this in Category:Railway lines opened in 1988 when it was opened in 1864? --Redrose64 (talk) 17:32, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed! best, Sunil060902 (talk) 17:41, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Intermediate Terminals[edit]

I've added citation requests for five of those given, as to my knowledge, based on daily use over 25 years, none of these have ever been used in normal running - during engineering works, yes, but not normal running. WillE (talk) 20:09, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Victoria line which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 21:00, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Grammar or syntax error[edit]

"As of December 2012, off-peak there are six trains per hour, calling at all stations, and requiring 15 trains for the peak-hour service."


I think the writer means:

"As of December 2012, off-peak there are six trains per hour, calling at all stations. The line uses 15 trains for the peak-hour service." 82.45.172.71 (talk) 10:22, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to reword if you have a reliable source for those figures. Bazza 7 (talk) 12:24, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]