Talk:Gustav Hugo

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

"von"[edit]

Oddly, the only "Gustav von Hugo" is in the title of the 1911EB article, even the refs in other EB articles just say "Gustav Hugo", not to mention everybody else in the (Google) world. Stan 23:08 Apr 1, 2003 (UTC)

I've removed the "von". German WP (WP:de) has it, but cites Neue Deutsche Biographie (NDB) which doesn't. I've asked about it in WP:de Talk. Wikiain (talk) 03:03, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Gustav Hugo/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

This is the 1911 Britannica article with a portrait and a sentence about Marx added. It is well linked and categorized. No info boxes. It needs elaboration. Bob Burkhardt (talk) 15:31, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 15:31, 6 January 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 16:52, 29 April 2016 (UTC)