Talk:Forever Changes

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Library of Congress Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Library of Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Library of Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Library of CongressWikipedia:WikiProject Library of CongressTemplate:WikiProject Library of CongressLibrary of Congress articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

<^>v!!This album is connected!!v<^>[edit]

All song titles serve as redirects to this album, have their own pages, or have been placed at the appropriate disambiguation pages.--Hraefen ^Talk 18:57, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your Mind and We Belong Together...?[edit]

Should this perhaps have been titled 'You're Mine and We Belong Together'? I know it appears as above on the CD sleeve and no doubt the original recording notes, but it does sound like a misreading Martyn Smith (talk) 12:07, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Doors[edit]

Both this and the Doors' album "The Doors" claim to be ranked 40th on Rolling Stone's 500 Greatest Albums. This obviously cannot be true of both. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.50.207.180 (talk) 20:26, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Forever Changes -- The Book[edit]

The Authorized Biography of Arthur Lee,"Forever Changes: Arthur Lee and the Book of Love" by John Einarson is interesting reading. Someone with lots of time on their hands should use it and massively update all the articles about Arthur Lee and his albums. :-) For now, I've just added a couple of things. 24.27.31.170 (talk) 15:48, 24 February 2011 (UTC)Eric[reply]

About the cover[edit]

I always though the design of the cover was meant to make the viewer think of Africa. Is this not the case?__209.179.22.26 (talk) 19:26, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Forever Changes/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)

Press [show] to view →

All the start class criteria

Y A completed infobox, including cover art and most technical details
Y At least one section of prose (excluding the lead section)
Y A track listing containing track lengths and authors for all songs
Y A full list of personnel, including technical personnel and guest musicians
Y Categorisation at least by artist and year
Y A casual reader should learn something about the album. Cavie78 (talk) 14:52, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Article requirements:
Y Start: reasonably complete infobox; lead section with overview of album; track listing; reference to at least primary personnel by name; Categorization by at least artist and year.
Y C: all of start and (1) cover art in infobox; (2) at least one additional section of prose; (3) track lengths & song authors in tracklist; (4) a personnel section including all musicians.

B: all of C and (1) most technical details in infobox; (2) technical personnel in personnel section; (3) no obvious issues with sourcing; (4) no obvious issues with readability, though it may not conform completely to style guidelines; (5) no glaring omissions of information (see some suggestions at WP:ALBUM) or extraneous information, like trivia.
Higher Classes are not assigned by WikiProject Album. Please review "the perfect article" and, if already B class, consider seeking additional feedback from Wikipedia:Good articles or Wikipedia:Featured articles.

Please see Wikipedia:WikiProject_Albums/Assessment for additional information on article class. To request a reassessment from the Album project, when concerns are addressed, please see "requesting an assessment".

Last edited at 14:52, 6 August 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 15:23, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

P4k review[edit]

The citation of the pitchfork.com review's score is erroneous as it refers specifically to the collector's edition. "If I were reviewing only the original material that forms the basis of this Collector's Edition of Love's Forever Changes, I'd certainly give it a 10.0 and praise it in the most glowing terms possible." 2603:8000:BA00:4166:2448:2A5E:56A9:58D6 (talk) 19:36, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]