Talk:Berlin Codex

Christianity Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Religious texts (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religious texts, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Religious textsWikipedia:WikiProject Religious textsTemplate:WikiProject Religious textsReligious texts articles

Egypt Low‑importance

	Egypt portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Egypt on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject EgyptTemplate:WikiProject EgyptEgypt articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Contradictory?[edit]

Papyrus bound or leather/wooden boards? Presumably the codex cannot be both?

Discrepancies?[edit]

The Apocryphon of John is not listed as part of the Berlin Codex in the texts section of the Gnosticism entry. The articles need bringing into line? Sophia of Jesus presumably = Wisdom of Jesus but there is a small discrepancy between the two articles. Which should be prefered?

Please can someone clarify what is correct. What pages of the Gospel of Mary survived? Here it states that 1-6 and 11-14 survived (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gospel_of_Mary) but above it states that these pages are missing.

Thanks

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Berlin Codex. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140714202711/http://www.naghammadi.org/traductions/traductions.aspx?lang=eng to http://www.naghammadi.org/traductions/traductions.aspx?lang=eng

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:50, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]