Talk:Shōwa Restoration

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	Japanese military history task force

Japan

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 18:28, April 23, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: Kako River (Japan)
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Pure Japanese, Vinland Saga (TV series), Japanese destroyer Ume (1944), Mai Fujisawa, Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Untitled[edit]

The title is based on an incorrect piece of history: the Showa period began in 1926. Charles Matthews 14:09, 28 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Kita Ikki was not a soldier, as far as I know. Charles Matthews 16:52, 23 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is "the encyclopedia anyone can edit", as you know. Why don't you clean it up yourself? -- Mkill 17:21, 23 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Use of talk pages is, for example, to document queries. I'm not so sure of my ground that I want to 'be bold', here. Our Kita Ikki article says nothing to indictate that he was a military man. Since that's my main source, I will be more tentative than in some cases. Charles Matthews 17:33, 23 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I tried to get some information from Japanese Wikipedia. It looks like this guy really was more of an intellectual (思想家 as the ja:WP puts it), military is not mentioned. As far as I get it, he was a student hanging around in revolutionary circles. Since almost every fact in the original Showa Restoration article was messed up, I'm not surprised the user was wrong on the military part, too. -- Mkill 00:44, 24 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

showa restoration was a fascism in japan.[edit]

it was effected to japanese fascism. why showa restoration not a fascism? ikki kita and imperior way faction occured february 26 incident for establish fascist japan. ikki kita who effect showa restoration isn't a soldier, but japanese fascist. japanese fascists(ikki kita, imperior way faction) had effected showa restoration. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KFU1423 (talk • contribs)

Sources which directly describe "Shōwa Restoration" as fascism? - Ryk72 ^talk 05:39, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

it describe the first step of japanese militarism. militarism is source of fascism. and showa restoration insist Militarism, Nationalism, Racism, Ultranationalism, Totalitarianism. it accord with fascism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KFU1423 (talk • contribs) 05:55, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources, not original research or a synthesis thereof. - Ryk72 ^talk 06:16, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lead sentence needs a noun[edit]

The lead sentence is currently The Shōwa Restoration (昭和維新 shōwaishin) was promoted by Japanese author Kita Ikki, with the goal of restoring power to the newly enthroned Japanese Emperor Hirohito and abolishing the liberal Taishō democracy. While this is good, it leaves open the question of what the Showa Restoration actually is. Is it an idea? A movement? A philosophy? Something else? Suggest we look at the referenced sources and try to work a noun in there. - Ryk72 ^talk 05:47, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]