Talk:LAPB
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
the "P" in LAPB does not in any way stand for protocol, LAPB is part of a group that falls under LAP which stands for Link Access Procedure, where LAPB is a protocol, the proper name does not include the use of "protocol" as in "Link Access Protocol, Balanced". The proper name is in fact "Link Access Procedure, Balanced" --64.208.7.126 22:36, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
Still a stub?[edit]
I think that perhaps the stub boilerplate should be removed now, the article is of a moderate enough length. --Jason (talk) 13:16, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
A lot of the text here comes from http://www.javvin.com/protocolLAPB.html . Just so you know that whoever added it was copying text that was not original. 71.194.39.134 (talk) 08:17, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on LAPB. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added
{{dead link}}tag to http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/cisintwk/ito_doc/x25.htm - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060408153932/http://www2.rad.com/networks/1994/hdlc/hdlc.htm to http://www2.rad.com/networks/1994/hdlc/hdlc.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:42, 14 December 2017 (UTC)