Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luelinks 2

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - redirected - SimonP 06:23, Mar 29, 2005 (UTC)

Luelinks[edit]

This is one of the multitudes of GameFAQs spinoffs. Much like the recently deleted Fuck you and die article, it's a private forum. Previously speedy deleted because it had little content. It has been recreated with more content, but several users have been redirecting it to GameFAQs. One user keeps reverting, so I'd like to obtain consensus on redirecting this. Please don't suggest speedy deletion, since this IS a different article than the one which was speedied before. It should go through a full VfD to build consensus. Some people have a notion that once an article has been speedied, it can be deleted without due process at any point in the future. This is wrong.

The previous discussion is available here. Rhobite 17:05, Mar 13, 2005 (UTC)

Redirect. -Sean Curtin 19:05, Mar 13, 2005 (UTC)
Redirect and Protect against changing it back. Not notable. DaveTheRed 19:06, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Redirect and Protect both this and LUElinks --BesigedB ^(talk) 20:14, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Redirect to discourage recreation - David Gerard 01:36, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Redirect / Protect agree with the above Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 14:28, Mar 14, 2005 (UTC)
Delete permanently and protect - Otherwise, the LUElinkers will be at this again and again. The #136,277 Alexa ranking shows that the site is non-notable. User:Markl222
Delete this webcruft. Please. Edeans 03:33, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.