User talk:Weaverluke
Welcome!
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Naming conventions
- Manual of Style
- If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Wikipedia:Topical index.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! - Matani2005 18:48, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Trust[edit]
I thought it was rather poetic, too! So much so that I decided to keep it there, only <!--"commented out"--> (See this diff) in case it could be reincorporated. Im glad you like the changes, though —I was wondering about whether the writer would take issue. Sinreg -SV|t 04:57, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Faith[edit]
"I think "Faith is hope in action" pretty much makes sense" - I dont know about that — the problem is the word "is," which implies a definitiveness. saying "A is B" is (theres that word) equivalent (at least a modifier) to saying A = B. The term "faith" is far too deep and broad to say it "is" something - rather say 'its a word which tends to be used in certain contexts, which are...' Your'e saying something like A = B/C, which gives a nice clear relationship between these elements, but since none of them are measurable, to assert that such a relationship between them is original research. While poetic, its meaning and wording is far too subjective to be called encyclopedic. Certainly gives food for thought to the next editor, but its not really definitive of what it is - again, "it" is a word, which means... etc. Get my drift? Sinreg, -SV|t 04:42, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
LinkedIn? :)[edit]
I stumbled upon your profile at LinkedIn. I was recently thinking they should have an industry group for Wikipedians... --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 15:32, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Digital identity[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Digital identity requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.itu.int/osg/csd/emerging_trends/handle_system/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. FockeWulf FW 190 (talk) 21:17, 4 November 2017 (UTC)