Talk:Palestinian Society for the Protection of Human Rights

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I checked out their website, and it's heavy on rhetoric while light on documentation. I would not consider it a reliable "source" for anything except its own point of view. --Ed Poor

As an interesting sideline, it was a week after the US refused to attend a WCAR conference (which was focused on attacking Israel) that bin Laden's conducted the 9-11 attack. Coincidence? --Ed Poor


However, many neutral observers welcome the organisation's determination to further the cause of Palestinians by the use of legal action rather than violence.

Above sentence sounds propagandistic. Who are these "neutral observers"? Can neutral observers "welcome" the furthering of a cause and remain neutral? I'd like the sentence better if it said something like Brothers in Peace, an organiziation that takes no sides in any controversy, praised LAW's refusal to use violence. (I made up "Brothers in Peace"). Please fix the sentence and put it back in. --Ed Poor

but some Israelis accuse the group of selectively ignoring alleged crimes committed by the Palestinian Authority and presenting a unilateral position of a propagandist nature

Similar comments to Ed's, above - this sounds like propaganda. Can those "some Israelis" and their views on LAW be sourced?

Dead link[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!


maru (talk) contribs 05:03, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dead link[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!


maru (talk) contribs 05:03, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Palestinian Society for the Protection of Human Rights. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:22, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]