Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Einstein Field Equations (EFE)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was ambiguous. 3 clear "delete" votes, 2 clear "redirect" and one "delete and redirect" which must be interpreted as "keep". The decision defaults to "keep".
Reviewing the article, I concur with the assessment that there is nothing to merge. Therefore, I will do a redirect without merge. By the way, my personal vote is redirect for two reasons. 1) Redirects are cheap. 2) It might prevent the article from reappearing. Rossami (talk) 03:53, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Einstein Field Equations (EFE)[edit]
Einstein Field Equations (EFE) is a recently created stub which seems to have no material that is not already present in Einstein's field equation, nor even any such potential. Whether you want to consider the tensor equation of GR one equation or many equations is really a semantic matter, and in no meaningful way does pluralizing qualify the phrase to be a different article. -Lethe | Talk 11:55, Jan 17, 2005 (UTC)
- Redirect to Einstein's field equation. — Asbestos | Talk 13:17, 17 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Redirect to Einstein's field equation. PaulHammond 13:53, Jan 17, 2005 (UTC)
- Merge with Einstein's field equation, and then redirect. Megan1967 00:42, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. The material is already present in Einstein's field equation, so a merge isn't needed, and the article title is not appropriate for a redirect. --Carnildo 19:38, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, per Carnildo. —Korath (Talk) 01:20, Jan 23, 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.