Talk:Changwon

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Zsj.engl300. Peer reviewers: D.steel, Steeniejung.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 17:10, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No Gus???[edit]

Why aren't there any Gus for this city- it has over 500,000 people?66.27.215.103 (talk) 15:50, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Needs Edit by Someone with Native Level English Skill[edit]

This article contains numerous grammatical errors and quite a bit of it is just plain unintelligible. I could help on the obvious errors but the unintelligible bits are beyond me. Perhaps a native Korean with good English skills and someone with native English and some Korean skills could team up and decipher the intended meaning. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.51.185.47 (talk) 00:52, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

City Location[edit]

The image showing the city's location in the right bar at the top of the page is incorrect. It has Namhae highlighted in red, not Changwon... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.77.224.212 (talk) 09:50, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This suggestion should be denied as the mentioned image is correct in displaying Chagnwon's location in the map. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jsyjj92 (talkcontribs) 00:41, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A possible start for correcting and polishing the page of Changwon[edit]

User:Jsyjj92/sandbox

check it out :)

-grammar, wording, general conventions were edited -ordering of topics, and the general content flow was revised -marked incomprehensible paragraphs with [clarification needed] for others to pay attention to -removed any unnecessary info or inaccurate info

further suggestions:

  • would like to add several images like of parks, the city's symbol, graphs of economical stats, etc.
  • history section needs to be entirely redone - improvement in detail, accuracy, relevancy
  • other sources that is not in Korean, to strengthen the quality of references

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Jsyjj92 (talkcontribs) 00:46, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please would an interested editor assess the above rewrite offered in 2014, incorporate what is useful, blank the user page as WP:COPYARTICLE, and leave a note here when done? – Fayenatic London 19:35, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Changwon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:44, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Changwon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:44, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Great additions! Can't spot any errors. D.steel (talk) 20:05, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]