User talk:Njaard

You may have noticed that the guacamole page already contained a link to the wiki cookbook, which is the preferred location for recipes. Maybe you would like to edit that page instead. Burschik 12:04, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Misty Morning Photo[edit]

I assure you this photo is totally authentic - I think the only post processing down on this image is resizing/cropping. This is REAL nature! Taken at Swifts Creek, Victoria, Australia. --Fir0002 www 22:10, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

SHA and modulo[edit]

Hi,

please could you revert your change to the SHA hash functions article? The ≡ denotes congruence modulo (how could one take a message of any length less that 2⁶⁴ bits and, adding zeroes, reach something which has only 448 of them?). —Gennaro Prota ^•Talk 19:19, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I just reread it and I was mistaken. However, there also seems to still be a mistake with my parentheses. However the actual reason I changed it was that that symbol was not part of my font, so instead I will link the symbol to its article. However, I still believe that the paren was in the wrong location and will leave it that way. If I am mistaken with that as well, then please fix it. njaard 06:56, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

MiB in MoS[edit]

Hi there! In this edit, you implied that the Wikipedia Manual of Style prefers the newer binary multipliers (mebi-, kibi-, etc.) over the classic SI units (mega-, kilo-, etc.). I was unable to find that in the MOS. Could you point me at the specific page/section? Please note that I'm not accusing you of lying; I want to be able to cite it myself in the future. :) Thanks. —DragonHawk (talk|hist) 04:10, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

it is not, but quoth http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_(dates_and_numbers)#Binary_prefixes - "the use of parentheses for IEC binary prefixes, for example, 256 KB (KiB) is acceptable, as is the use of footnotes to disambiguate prefixes" (so what is there should remain but the binary units can be added) njaard 06:36, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ahhh. Cool. Thanks! —DragonHawk (talk|hist) 07:14, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Journey's End (song)[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Journey's End (song), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Journey's End (song). Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? (You tagged this page for notability concerns back in October of last year, and nobody's edited it significantly since.) —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 03:53, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:An elixir for existence album.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:An elixir for existence album.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 02:46, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Enslavement of Beauty for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Enslavement of Beauty is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enslavement of Beauty until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. meco (talk) 21:54, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Café Gratitude may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Previous locations included San Francisco, [[Healdsburg]], [[Oakland], and inside the [[Cupertino]] [[Whole Foods]]. They closed following a lawsuit filed by

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:20, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license[edit]

Unspecified source/license for File:Boisea rubrolineata.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Boisea rubrolineata.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 21:00, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 19[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Boisea rubrolineata, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Corium (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Njaard. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Njaard. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Njaard. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]