User talk:Boothy443/Archive 2

Do not revert changes to Template:Infobox President

Please do not revert my changes to the template. Thank you! --Just my 2 cents -- Hemanshu 03:14, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Reverting my changes led to the template not working properly. so I requested you not to do so. Where is the question of permission or ownership in that? I do not think I own any page. --Just my 2 cents -- Hemanshu 03:20, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Do note my first statement.--User:Boothy443 | comhrÚ 03:25, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Mistake

What am I supposed to have vandalized ? I don not understand your message ???

Time restrictions

My workplace has removed internet access from the computer that I'm at for half the shift. The other half of the shift is spent mostly making rounds, which leaves very little free time to help out around here. I try to help with the simple things that can be done in short bursts -- I'm still liable to get called away at any time for one reason or another. I'm seriously considering getting RR at home so I can get on here more often. I see you're staying busy.  :-) SWAdair | Talk 07:06, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)

• My computer time at home is usually spent playing games or touching up photos. (I can't believe I spent three grand on that computer and mainly use it as a game machine. Sheesh!) I would gladly give up the game time to get my WP fix. SWAdair | Talk 07:12, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Amtrak

I tried a minor rewording and I fear that I wrote a short book. Please let me know what you think, and feel free to condense, etc. Thanks for the headsup. Mark in Richmond Vaoverland 07:57, Feb 21, 2005 (UTC)

Capital Beltway

I responded on Talk:Capital Beltway; I propose Interstate 495 (Capital Beltway) as a compromise, though it will have to be listed on WP:RM to be moved there. Anyway, wherever you end up moving it, please fix the double redirects (as well as the link in Template:3di 95).

By the way, thanks for editing Interstate 495 (Washington, D.C.) so a move back there will also require listing on WP:RM.

As for moving Interstate 395 (Washington, D.C.) to Interstate 395 (District of Columbia/Virginia), I have no real objection to this (though I have been using Washington, D.C. in titles rather than District of Columbia), but if you're going to make changes like this, PLEASE fix the double redirects and Template:3di 95. If you don't do this, I'm going to move it back. --SPUI (talk) 20:53, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)

NCAA championships

I'm not sure why you made this edit. The removal of that line was correct. CryptoDerk 05:59, Feb 23, 2005 (UTC)

It wasn't vandalism. Indiana has won 5 national championships and is already listed as having won 5. When the anon removed the line "Indiana 1" they were correct to do so. CryptoDerk 06:10, Feb 23, 2005 (UTC)

WHAT THE FUCK,

I NEVER FUCKING EDITTED ANY FUCKING VANDALISEN- STOP FUCKING ACCUSING FUCKING ME- FUCK YOU AND STO FUCKING SENDING ME FUCKING MESSAGES YOU FUCKING FUCKER. --KIDWBVUGVFGTYR 06:02, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC)

and hse just proves who he really is --User:Boothy443 | comhrÚ 06:12, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you friend, for reverting the...... strange, let us say, vandalism KIDWBVUGVFGTYR commited on my page. I would have done the same for you (washing away the vandalism, not vandalize) ;), but I'll leave you the priviledge since another comment has been added below it. How do we submit a ban suggestion on Wikipedia? --Liberlogos 06:14, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC)

And by the way, do you know what this was about? I am aware of no edit of his having been reverted by myself. --Liberlogos 06:16, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC)

I apologize.....

I'm sorry if I caused any trouble, i was going to go back and erase it. I was just having a laugh with friend.....sorry, no more.

Yo

You must give prove that I vandalised before you accuse me. --De la a la de a la 06:43, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Yo Again

Im afraid thats not enough evidence- Im sorry :( --De la a la de a la 06:53, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Hello

IM BACK!! --De la a la de a la 06:56, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC),is really User:219.77.244.182 but he isnt smart enough to know that sit still shows up in the log.

Donegal Celtic

Hello??? Boothy, please stop changing my entry on Donegal Celtic, i am a suppporter of the football club, everything in the article i wrote is completely accurate! and nothing is copyrighted. This is my team i know the history i know the club! you do not, so please leave it as it is!!!

Thank You
You Prick
Tiocfaidh Ar La

My page

Please stop reverting my user page. You are simply reverting my page on a whim without consulting me or anyone else, or following any sort of procedure. You claim to opposed in principle to vandals, but you have no problem engaging in revert wars when it suits you. What you are doing to me is a form of vandalism too.

Humm no sig, thinks he owns an ip, intresting concept. --User:Boothy443 | comhrÚ 07:05, 28 Feb 2005 (UTC)

I used to have a username until persistent false accusations from an administrator named Apollomelos forced me to stay anonymous.

ahh so he is a anon vandal. sure buddy. --User:Boothy443 | comhrÚ 07:09, 28 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Learn how to speak English please: "an anon vandal." Your last response was incoherent. I am not an anon vandal; I simply do not want to be attacked.

right buddy, what ever, if you dont want to be attacked, then dont edit, welcome to the real world where things arnt always roses. --User:Boothy443 | comhrÚ 18:37, 28 Feb 2005 (UTC)

I have been called a homophobe, bigot, Ku Klux Klan member, been charged with concerted vandalism, and do not enjoy it. I have had my username deleted in utter embarrasment. That is not fair.

As if on one else has ever been called that, true or not. Life isnt fair, deal with it. Their must have been some reason for repatiable users to say such things, and user names can not be deleted, and if your sooo offended by what has happend to you why dont you take it to a higher autority then attempting your dumb campaing of i dont think i should bee called this so i wipe my page clean thinbg, so that you raise the ire of others. But i dout that you will do that so in the mean time bugg off my talk page on your watch list. --User:Boothy443 | comhrÚ 22:24, 28 Feb 2005 (UTC) Oh btw i sig your post, or i will consider them vandalism

You are seriously illiterate. Just about everything you write is mispelled. Thanks for telling me to "bugg" off, nice day to you too. 128.143.167.170 22:50, 28 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Didnt know that i was taken a spelling test, i thought that these pages are used for informal chat, huh. --User:Boothy443 | comhrÚ 22:54, 28 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Pioneer Zephyr

I would appreciate if you could take a quick look at this FAC. If you agree, we could use a support vote for it. The other writer has doen some great stuff on railroads. We're not getting objections, just not enough support. Thanks. Vaoverland 05:23, Mar 1, 2005 (UTC)

IP

You need a developer to get a logged in user's IP. RickK 08:44, Mar 1, 2005 (UTC)

Every time I've sent an email to an ISP asking them to do something about a vandal, they don't even bother to respond. RickK 08:51, Mar 1, 2005 (UTC)

edit summaries

I know vandals can be annoying, but edit summaries like "Hey ASSHOLE, get a fing life and go f off" are too likely to cause edit wars and unnecessary problems. Please, make sure you stay friendly even to the worst of editors. It's the best way to stay out of trouble. ;) Mgm|^(talk) 09:39, Mar 1, 2005 (UTC)

Dont belive it would have made a difference anyway. --User:Boothy443 | comhrÚ 09:41, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC)

I'm the so called VANDAL

My apologies, but I only vandalised one page, ISO 216. I did this to test the response time of admins. All the other notes on my page were, I imagain, from other users of my IP address. Also, according to the instructions at the top of this page here, capital letters shouldn't be used. Sorry to have bothered you, but please do reply,--62.253.64.17 07:13, 5 Mar 2005 (UTC)

• If it wasn't you who vandalized other pages, it was somebody sharing your IP address. Look here for example. Don't want to be mistaken for such people? Then get your own username. Even if this earlier vandalism wasn't by you, it seems extraordinarily arrogant to vandalize a single page in order to "test the response time of admins": it means that you believe your little experiment is more valuable than others' time. Anyone having a legitimate reason (hard to imagine) for such an "experiment" would, just for starters, already be knowledgable about Wikipedia; and anyone who's knowledgable about Wikipedia knows that people other than administrators can and do revert vandalism. -- Hoary 12:09, 2005 Mar 5 (UTC)

Vandal

Sorry about that. I just saw it. He's also going to have to change his name. If this happens again, take it to WP:AN/I. RickK 07:02, Mar 11, 2005 (UTC)

Oh, and I was already planning on wearing jeans and a Hawaiian shirt tomorrow.  :) RickK 07:05, Mar 11, 2005 (UTC)

Re:VFD

Are you talking about Jeffsterz? It is absolutely OK to bring old, orphaned VfDs to reconsideration. In fact, it's most of the time the only proper way to handle a vandalized VfD that never got deleted but is not a speedy. Keep up with the good work you are doing! jni 10:25, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)

KYW

Please put the KYW (AM) page back where it belongs. There is no such thing as "-AM". 18.26.0.18 18:32, 12 Mar 2005 (UTC)

London

Could you please desist from your bizarre recreation of pointless white space in the London article? Thank you. Wincoote 08:01, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)

whatever dude. --Boothy443 | comhrÚ 08:03, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)

I did look at my edits before I posted them. Your justification for your latest revert is simply untrue, unless articles can display differently for different users. Wincoote 08:07, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Equis International

Hello. I reverted your copyvio notice on Equis International, and I thought I ought to explain myself. The copyright holders at the company gave permission for the text to be released under the GFDL, as described in the talk page. Thanks for listing items on WP:CP though! Your work is appreciated. – Quadell ^{(talk) (sleuth)} 12:23, Mar 16, 2005 (UTC)

User_talk:Narcissus14

Why do you call my edits "vandalism"?

"Vandalism is indisputable bad-faith addition, deletion, or change to content, made in a deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of the encyclopedia. The largest quantity of vandalism consists of replacement of prominent articles with obscenities, namecalling, or other wholly irrelevant content. Any good-faith effort to improve the encyclopedia, even if misguided or ill-considered, is not vandalism. Apparent bad faith edits that do not make their bad faith nature explicit and inarguable, are not considered vandalism at Wikipedia." see Wikipedia:Vandalism

Please clarify your view.

User:Auto movil

Do not revert changes without reason. I see you have a longstanding problem with that. Auto movil 08:26, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)

I said don't revert people's changes without reason. You reverted a good sentence back into a bad one, and if you don't know what I'm referring to, you're probably changing too many articles at once. Auto movil 08:33, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Your accusation has been noted. Please do something productive with your time. Auto movil 08:41, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Another wonderful Wiki user with a stick up his a@@, give me a freaking break, at least i am not being a crybaby. Oh and BTW i did leave a reason, HA. --Boothy443 | comhrÚ 08:49, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Why Boothy, I believe you've just broken Wiki policy against abusiveness. That's even worse than tampering with edits, making false accusations, and all the other things I see here on your very contentious talk page. Pleasure to have known you. Auto movil 09:10, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Vandal?

I beg your pardon. Ameliorate your language, I am but a noob, not a vandal. Try not to feel so self-important. You may live longer. KingOfAllPaperboys 03:41, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Oh, how nice... threats of violence and death too? Check please! -- Netoholic @ 03:47, 2005 Mar 26 (UTC)

Heaven forfend! I thought she might live longer if she weren't so excitable.

I never threaten. KingOfAllPaperboys 03:57, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Wilmington Station

I think the Wilmington Station article I made should be changed back to its original name. It is primarily Amtrak, not Septa. All the Amtrak Northeast trains pass thorugh it but only one Septa line goes there.

Because there are many cities named Wilmington. Amtrak even serves more than one. --SPUI (talk) 04:30, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)

I'd disagree with you there - in my opinion it should go at the local commuter rail service rather than Amtrak. Anyway, Wilmington Rail Station definitely isn't the right name. --SPUI (talk) 04:39, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)

However, we do have articles like Park Street (MBTA station), not Park Street Station. --SPUI (talk) 04:55, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)

What about calling it Wilmington (Delaware) Rail Station? It is owned by Amtrak. So it could also be called Wilmington (Delaware) Amtrak Station.

What about simply using the standard that other pages use, except for famous ones like South Station (Boston) - Wilmington, Delaware (Amtrak station) or Wilmington (SEPTA station)? --SPUI (talk) 05:03, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)

What's wrong with 'giving preference' as long as we have a clearly defined way of doing it? We 'give preference' all the time in article names. Interstate 280 (California) is not at Junipero Serra Freeway. West Side Highway is not at Joe DiMaggio Highway. --SPUI (talk) 05:16, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Yeah, I did. In that you're wrong. Wilmington Rail Station is not a famous name. --SPUI (talk) 05:20, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)

K Street

For now, the information on the show and the place is on the same page, K Street (Washington, DC), because the two are so closely linked. If you could expand the show article enough to require it's own page, it would be very helpful. Thanks, Meelar (talk) 07:36, Mar 28, 2005 (UTC)

Red Arrow Trolleys

Did you see the new article I wrote? I saw that you put up a map of the Norristown trolley. It would be good to put one on the Media and Sharon Hill trolley article.

POV

I'd appreciate if you'd keep an eye on Washington, D.C. and National Rifle Association; there's a bit of a dispute with User:Nyr14 about POV in those articles. If you could help by reverting his changes and making him discuss more on talk, I'd appreciate. Yours, Meelar (talk) 18:29, Apr 6, 2005 (UTC)

Washington Senators/Nationals

No, you misunderstand my point. It's not that "Nats" was the most obvious abbreviation of "Nationals," or that the nickname didn't first derive from the original name of the team. It was simply convenient that "Senators" could yield the same nickname as "Nationals." So the momentum of traditional undeniably did play a significant role, but it's unlikely that the name would have continued to be used had the team changed its official name to something which didn't have the letters NAT somewhere in succession. – Seancdaug 05:41, Apr 9, 2005 (UTC)

• I grew up in the 60s, and it was *understood* that Nats was short for "Nationals", the old alternate name for the Washingtonians. With a seed of doubt planted, I've been looking through Google (realizing that a "fact" being on the Internet, or not, proves nothing) and so far nearly everyone says "Nats" was short for "Nationals". I haven't seen anyone make the connection about NAT being in "Senators". Keep in mind that writers of the 60s were still close to the time when "Nationals" was in more common usage. There's plenty of fiction on the Internet. I saw one site where somebody said "Nat" was short for the Latin word for Senator. Honk! Wrong! And pretty funny, given that the Latin word for Senator is actually "Senator".

• • I still say it's a raw deal to make Washington taxpayers pay for a baseball stadium. DC doesn't need prestige; it is the freaking capital of the U.S. Baseball is a cash cow; it can pay for itself or leave. The council members who backed down when it threatened to leave were cowards. /rant DDerby 08:30, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Oriole Park

Good point, improved wording, although I think Union Park was also called Oriole Park from time to time. Things were not so formal in those days. I will try to do better with the wording. I am enjoying the writing, it's a good outlet, I just need to learn to keep my many opinions to myself most of the time. - Wahkeenah.

Wahkeenah 08:21, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)

NRA

Hey, did you know that the NRA first came to prominence in the 1930s, when their overhunting drove the rare Blue Eagle to the brink of extinction?

(Apologies to Richard Armour).

Question with respect to College Park vote

I posted a question at Wikipedia:University of Maryland, College Park/Vote#Disagree in response to your comment on the College Park portion of the vote. Dragons flight 22:07, Apr 9, 2005 (UTC)

Re: Newgrounds

You're quite welcome; and thank you for fighting the good fight! :) -- Hadal 02:38, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Ah! Thanks for pointing him out. I had been hiding registered users from my RC results to make sure I hadn't missed any bad edits from anons. (I've been a bit distracted lately.) I'll keep his contribs page active in my browser. Cheers, -- Hadal 02:49, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for keeping my userpage clean! DDerby 07:55, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Sorry.

Just having a little harmless fun. It won't happen again.

---

Thank you, Boothy, for your contribution to the Terri Schiavo discussion.

Would you be so kind as to consider adding a comment here, please? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/NCdave

Thank you, -Dave

Heh, first you apologize for a "little harmless fun" but please be on my side man! Ye gads, Dave, have you no shame? Professor Ninja 18:34, Apr 12, 2005 (UTC)

I wasn't the one who wrote "Sorry." / "Just having a little harmless fun. It won't happen again." That was somebody called DanPanic. I have no idea what that was all about. My note to Boothy was because I noticed that he had made a constructive contribution to the Terri_Schiavo discussion. Sorry I didn't notice when I added my note that it was right after an unsigned note from someone else, so that it wasn't obvious that his note and mine were from different people. NCdave 14:39, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)

request denied. --Boothy443 | comhrÚ 22:08, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)

• ha ha --AStanhope 01:04, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Wikithanks

Hey there, thanks for reverting my userpage! And great job all around, I always see you cleaning up vandalism :) TIMBO (T A L K) 05:06, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Oliver North onslaught

There seems to be an onslaught on the Oliver North page. Thanks for keeping up with it. Could the page just be protected for a few hours until it dies down? --Holdek ^(talk) 05:46, Apr 13, 2005 (UTC)

Doesn't do any good. They've moved on to the Howard Dean article now. RickK 05:47, Apr 13, 2005 (UTC)

The socks do indeed hit a bunch of political articles, although Oliver North seems to be the focal point. At the risk of sounding like a n00b, is there any way to find his IP and then block that? TIMBO (T A L K) 05:53, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Only developers can find the IPs of logged in users. RickK 05:56, Apr 13, 2005 (UTC)

• Just a matter of finding some one willing to take some initative to do it. --Boothy443 | comhrÚ 05:57, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Wouldn't do much good, would it? Each time we block a logged-in user, the associated IP also gets blocked temporarily (and this shows up in the Ipblocklist), but each time they're able to create new usernames and continue. So it's not a single IP. -- Curps 08:19, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • Well just have to do more proactive adminstrating to keep the socks under control. --Boothy443 | comhrÚ 08:21, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)

My user page

Hey Boothy, thanks for reverting the helpful diagram someone left on my user page. ;-) Best, SlimVirgin ^(talk) 06:33, Apr 13, 2005 (UTC)

Oh, it was just an autofellatio image. I didn't really mean it was helpful. LOL! SlimVirgin ^(talk) 06:45, Apr 13, 2005 (UTC)

User 68.55.111.13's response

I didn't vandalize any pages. -- 68.55.111.13 07:29, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Penguins

Not a speedy delete — a redirect to Penguin. Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 08:50, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)

• someone's dumb attempt at a spelling mistake, they cant tell the differenc between a g and a q. --Boothy443 | comhrÚ 08:52, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Taoiseach

Are you refering to the Republic of Ireland article? I think the change occurred when Cantus redid the infobox. It might have been a mistake. Iota 14:24, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Vandalizing

hey what the heck are you always doing on wikipedia? you like to spot vandals? -- 4.246.42.49

Humor, I'm touched

Thank you for the sockpuppet pic. You are a gent. A cunt too. But a gent at least.

• At least I am a gent, can't say the same for you, so sad. --Boothy443 | comhrÚ 07:26, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)

I have been treated most shabbily. My attempts to remove leftist bias have been met with blatant abuse of power. Enjoy my revenge. Hairyhillary 07:28, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)

• Thats nice. --Boothy443 | comhrÚ 07:32, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Arlenthespecter3

I have indefinitely blocked Arlenthespecter3 and Hairyhillary. Kingturtle 07:29, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)

John Kerry

What do you think about the three points I raised on the talk page, titled "Pro-Kerry bias 04.14.05"? Please reply at Talk:John_Kerry#Pro-Kerry_bias_04.14.05 or simply Talk:John_Kerry

Rex071404 ^{216.153.214.94} 08:08, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Keep up the good work

I've blocked 200.73.181.142 for 24hrs due to his/her repeated vandalism. I just wanted to say good show in dealing with him and --- why aren't you an admin already? -JCarriker 08:38, Apr 14, 2005 (UTC)

• yep. --Boothy443 | comhrÚ 08:41, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)

User:Calles loco vandal

anyways do you know why i vandalized ken bogan's page and called him nigger? hes a rapist. see his talk page and find out man . Calles loco 21:30, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)

That user knows me. He doesn't like me because of this. Would you look at this page? He is just a total retard. - Ken Bogan 21:53, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)

the Ward Churchill vandal

Hello, can you please explain why the article is POV now and it wasn't POV before. Johnnyio 03:20, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)

• their is the thing called edit history, let it explan for you. --Boothy443 | comhrÚ 03:24, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Just as I thought

You are a sockpuppet and you cannot justify your opinions. You will likewise be reported. Johnnyio 03:28, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)

• A puppet of who? --Boothy443 | comhrÚ 03:32, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Real Bad Attempt at a threat

• Just cleaning up after a vandal, and not like i havn't herd that one before, oh and manking threats is a breach of policy and is a lot more serious of a breach. --Boothy443 | comhrÚ 04:18, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Have reported your vandalism. Watch out. Johnnyio 04:24, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)

• Watching Watching. Oh look their is a bird, ooo lok their is a plane, ooo look their is a vandal/troll User:Johnnyio. --Boothy443 | comhrÚ 04:36, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Re: Thanks

No problem. I put a note at WP:AN/I, and now he's banned. Happy editing, TIMBO (T A L K) 05:10, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)

On a related note, I removed the VfD tag from Young Left because it seems the vote was never actually started - only the tag was inserted (which created the VfD subpage, and a subsequent argument between Johnnyio and the article's creator). Seems a little weird to me, am I wrong? TIMBO (T A L K) 05:34, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)

copyvio

What do u mean? If someone is so irresponsible that he posts copyvio messages everywhere without checking his own link, I should wait for him to respond? I randomly clicked two of his copyvio reports - both were not copyvios. Infact he was corrected by someon else for a wrong copyvio notice on the same page. In one case put a copyvio notice because the text was on a wikipedia mirror. Laugh. I am talking about his lucky fuy who put the copyvio notice.

• The article in question Kishore Kumar checks out, as the site it mirrowed from this site. --Boothy443 | comhrÚ 08:54, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Re: your warning

Since when does a nomination for adminship constitute "vandalism"? 63.173.114.137 22:46, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)

• Since you can't, that RFA is a joke, and putting a speedy delete on a page is vandalism. --Boothy443 | comhrÚ 22:49, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • I didn't put a speedy delete on anything. Someone else put a speedy tag on the SamuraiClinton nomination, which apparently carried over to the main page. Anyway, if it makes you feel better, I'll create an account and log in, since anon users seem to be treated like second-class citizens around here. 63.173.114.137 22:53, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • Anons no, morons yes, so register for your acoount and see the hammer keep on falling on you if you continue to be distruptive. Apprently you have been warned before i got to you. --Boothy443 | comhrÚ 22:57, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
      • Wikipedia:No personal attacks. 63.173.114.137 23:00, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • just calling a spade a spade, blah blah blah. --Boothy443 | comhrÚ 23:02, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Hello

I don't see what you mean about vandalism. I have removed material which I believe is misleading and erroneous. How is that vandalism? I am new to all this so please explain to me. Wendydrag 03:57, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)

fully sourced now, thanks for your input

Russ

• Yep thanks for it being preped for editing. --Boothy443 | comhrÚ 06:08, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Well, I don't keep track of them so much as just block them when I see them. As per ArbCom ruling on Iasson, it's reasonable to assume they're all sockpuppets, and use of sockpuppets for reverting or vandalism is banned. -- Curps 06:52, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)