Talk:Revolutionary Committee of the Chinese Kuomintang

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
There is a dispute between two versions. To see the other version: [1], to compare: [2]

  — Instantnood 03:55, Mar 29, 2005 (UTC)


Flag?[edit]

Is it allowed to fly the twelve-pointed white sun on blue flag? AnonMoos 02:17, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think the answer is no. And in fact more tellingly, even now that the "original" Kuomintang has reproached with the Communists and there are also splintering People First Party (Taiwan) and New Party (Taiwan) that are even more pro the "Chinese reunification uber alles with the Communists" position and regularly dialogue with the Communists the RCK has rarely remade any initiatives remaking contacts with these people. --JNZ (talk) 10:54, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Status Today?[edit]

Do they still do anything really meaningful? I guess we have to wait until the Communists liberalize political parties to see. I have read unsubstantiated articles written by Mainlanders on the net that the RCK has no new members based on ideology or even many new members at all. All they have now are opportunists who are salivating over the official positions the Communists have reserved for the bloc parties, and career Communist Party members who are ordered to register as members in order to fill up the party rank (as the older KMT defectors have started to die out and they need replenishment among ranks). --JNZ (talk) 10:54, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ideologies?[edit]

Ideologies in the infobox need to be cleaned up. Three Principles of the People and Chinese nationalism are probably true, but I doubt if conservatism is the right thing (and the party is probably not officially socialist either). Does anyone have further information? Miacek and his crime-fighting dog (woof!) 12:05, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Icon[edit]

It's true that the white-on-blue sun is the traditional KMT symbol, but there seems to be some doubt whether the RCCK uses it (see discussion above). If they don't use it, or if we're not sure whether they do, is it appropriate for us to associate it with the RCCK? On the other hand, the RCCK clearly does use the name of Sun Yat-sen, and I noticed a picture of him prominently displayed in a Xinhua photo of their congress last year. So I'd suggest a pic of Dr Sun may be a more appropriate logo for this page. Kalidasa 777 (talk) 22:08, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yesterday I made an edit to change the logo to a pic of Sun Yat-sen, with a report on their Congress as a supporting citation. The edit was reverted by Vif12vf  who made the comment “Portraits are not logo’s”. Surely a logo is anything someone uses as one? E.g. If a marxist political group uses a face of Karl Marx to express its identity, but doesn’t use the hammer-and-sickle, why would we put the hammer-and-sickle on the page about that group? Kalidasa 777 (talk) 20:24, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Where is the logo currently used from? I can't find it anywhere on their website. — Amitabho Chattopadhyay talk 10:11, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure, I did an image search and all I found was a page on a Chinese forum that links back to Wikipedia. I'm not sure where that symbol is from. ArchDuck1 (talk) 05:08, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The logo is literally on their website. The most obvious instance is on the top QR code on the bottom right when you arrive at the main page. Yue🌙 06:08, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It's from their official Wechat account, as this is the QR code to their account. ときさき くるみ not because they are easy, but because they are hard 16:02, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]