Talk:Prism

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconDisambiguation
WikiProject iconThis disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.

Do antiprisms maybe deserve their own page? We have as much space as we want, there's no need to cram things together.


Certainly. --AxelBoldt


Why is the Pink Floyd album on the disambguation page? If it's there, then technically every single use of prisms should be on this page. The Pink Floyd album should be mentioned on the page discussing visual prisms.

Apollo PRISM[edit]

The following link was recently removed:

PRISM was the RISC processor used in Apollo DN10000 systems

It was partly added to avoid confusion between DEC PRISM (which basically never existed) and Apollo PRISM (which did). There ought to be enough material to write a good article on the subject... but unfortunately, I haven't been able to find much on the web. --StuartBrady 21:08, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

team method: profiling[edit]

what about http://www.prism-profiling.com 84.59.185.74 (talk) 10:50, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Normally, dab pages only have links to existing wikipedia articles. That method doesn't have an article, and it doesn't seem notable enough to have its own article. --Enric Naval (talk) 01:57, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PRISM (metadata vocabulary)[edit]

While I understand "Multi Channel Publishing" may fall into the broad category of media, Publishing Requirements for Industry Standard Metadata is a specification. Hence the move from Media and entertainment to Computing and software. —Shelley V. Adams 15:53, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Primary topic[edit]

In my opinion, prism (optics) is the primary meaning and should have this page title. The disambiguation page should be moved to prism (disambiguation). Does anyone disagree? SpinningSpark 23:19, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Since no one commented, I have moved the page. SpinningSpark 07:01, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Agree (after the event) . Widefox; talk 16:00, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:PRISM (surveillance program) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 04:20, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Prism which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 13:45, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Removed from See also[edit]

I removed these from the See also section:

The first is not ambiguous, and not relevant enough to be in the See also section. The second is either ambiguous or is not relevant enough to be in the See also section. I went with the latter but am open to an argument that it is ambiguous and belongs in the body of the page. Srleffler (talk) 02:02, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]