Talk:WBGU (FM)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

All the information on this page about the history comes directly from the WBGU-FM training documents and thus is copywritten to the training director who made it and then updated this wiki, Andrew Balcerzak. It is not published, so citations are not available. The documentation is all in the station in electronic copy. Not sure how to show this? WBGU Member Dec 25 2007 (EST) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.62.26.230 (talk) The image is too large, but I can't get the resize coding to work (does this not work on GIFs?). Also, I'm concerned about copyright. Kelly Martin 04:55, Jun 5, 2005 (UTC)

Agree, image (wiki link: Image:WBGU 88.1 FM Coverage Pattern.gif ) is copyrighted to radio-locator.com, and is not fair use (as logos would be, by Wikipedia guidelines). I removed the image in favor of a new infobox incorporating WBGU-FM's logo. (There isn't room at present for both anyway.) SwissCelt 21:21, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Unfortunately the history section and 2nd paragraph have to go for now because of copyright issues. Information on how the owner of that copyright can grant use to Wikipedia is avalanche here, or the section can be rewritten to avoid any copyright problems.--RadioFan
(talk) 03:50, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Release of copyright has be set in motion. I feel like I tried to talk to RadioFan about this page, but started a near editing war, and I do not know why. Foodlovesme (talk) 23:21, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

{{OTRS pending}}

  • I have disabled this OTRS pending template, it is beyond stale. Monty845 03:36, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:WBGU (FM)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

I feel this article is well written and has a lot of information in it, pushing it above a C rating to a B. It needs footnote and citation work (of which I don't really know how to do right, I tried.) The citation information is available. It is mid priority because its listenership is less than 5,000 a week and the school it is apart of is about 20,000. Perhaps you feel it should be different? I was struggling to decide between mid and high, but went with the higher per the instructions on the Ohio page discussion Foodlovesme (talk) 20:30, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 20:32, 9 July 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 10:06, 30 April 2016 (UTC)