Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uberhax

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was redirect. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 21:28, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Uberhax

delete nonnnotable neoleetism. less that 200 google hits, means that online community didn't embrace it at all. Mikkalai 14:53, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. Never heard of it, and Google doesn't seem to know much about it either. This looks suspiciously similar to your average Urban Dictionary entry... Maybe redirect to Uberhack for Total Annihilation? — flamingspinach | (talk) 15:24, 2005 Apr 15 (UTC)
• Delete. Neoleetism. --Carnildo 22:43, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• WP is not a leet-speak dict. del BigFatDave 23:14, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Add this to the Leet article and d313t3 this article. Zscout370 00:29, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • You probably meant d31373? Mikkalai 18:44, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect to Uberhack for Total Annihilation. Megan1967 01:55, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Great idea! Changing my vote to redirect. Mikkalai 18:42, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • You probably meant r3d1r3c7? Radiant_* 13:13, Apr 18, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.