Talk:Cemetery H culture

Pakistan Low‑importance

	Pakistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archaeology

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

India: Geography Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian geography workgroup (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is a selected article on the India portal, which means that it was selected as a high quality India-related article.
	This article was last assessed in May 2012.

Cemeteries Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cemeteries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cemeteries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CemeteriesWikipedia:WikiProject CemeteriesTemplate:WikiProject CemeteriesCemeteries articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Recent Archeological digs in Pakistan[edit]

I have heard that the government of Pakistan has restarted archeological digs in and around Harappa and is trying to limit the extent of damage caused by the rising salt levels on the ancient site. There were reports that several new neighboorhoods were discovered, I dont remember where I read it but I remember it was a major find and was headline news a while back. Was hoping the article would have mentioned this! if I find it, I'll let you know! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.63.220.150 (talk) 03:33, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The connection between the Cemetery H culture and the RgVeda seems worth noting:

The range of identifiable places (mostly rivers) mentioned in the RgVeda correspond almost exactly to the boundaries of the Cemetery H culture. The hymns of RgVeda cannot have been composed later than 1200 BCE, nor earlier than 1900 BCE, (probably, they were composed between 1700 and 1600 BCE) so the time of the Cemetery H culture spans the time of the composition of the RgVeda.

The Cemetery H culture is perhaps not what one would have expected the culture described in the RgVeda to look like, archeologically; this may show that our ideas about this culture are mistaken.

The RgVeda certainly refers to the Indus river, while there are no Cemetery H sites (as far as I know) that far northwest. However, the homeland of the Purus and Bharatas, who are the protagonists of the RgVeda, did not include the Indus. Also, it is possible that Cemetery H culture does extend to the Indus, but that these sites have not yet been excavated.

Reference:

Rgvedic history: poets, chieftans and politics, by Michael Witzel, in The Indo-Aryans of Ancient South Asia, ed. by George Erdosy.

- Sandy Hodges

Rice[edit]

Does anybody have idea on how rice came to IVC?

Rice was domesticated in either China, Thiland or Assam. It is generally believed that the Ganges valley was populated by migrating Aryans after 1200 BC. If that be the case, then how did rice cultivation spread to last IVC?--UB 07:56, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

So Aryans couldn't learn how to farm rice? ;) --86.135.176.189 (talk) 23:35, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of sourced content[edit]

Godanov recently deleted the following content from this article: "Cremation in India is first attested in the Cemetery H culture, considered the formative stage of Vedic civilization. The Rigveda contains a reference to the emerging practice, in RV 10.15.14, where the forefathers "both cremated (agnidagdhá-) and uncremated (ánagnidagdha-)" are invoked".[1][2] The two references mentioned are both secondary and can be verified using the given google books links. Please give reasons for removing this sourced content.CorrectKnowledge (talk) 03:42, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cemetery H culture. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091030161353/http://pubweb.cc.u-tokai.ac.jp:80/indus/english/3_1_02.html to http://pubweb.cc.u-tokai.ac.jp/indus/english/3_1_02.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:14, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Cemetery H culture. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://pubweb.cc.u-tokai.ac.jp/indus/english/3_1_02.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060908052731/http://pubweb.cc.u-tokai.ac.jp/indus/english/3_1_01.html to http://pubweb.cc.u-tokai.ac.jp/indus/english/3_1_01.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:34, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

South Asia (orthographic projection) without national boundaries.svg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:08, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indo-European?[edit]

How could this culture have been Indo-European, if Proto-Indo-European language existed just 800 years prior somewhere in Europe? If these people were R1a1-L645 and came from Europe, it's not a proof they were Indo-European. R1a1-L645 is present in other language families even in Europe, not to mention other places. --95.24.71.165 (talk) 21:30, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]