Talk:Pilot licensing and certification

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

untitled[edit]

This page and others uploaded in the part hour (23 articles) are a reorganization suggested a few weeks ago. See the discussion under the "Pilot licences" page, which became a redirect so you will have to link back to it. David Brooks 07:45, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)

For reference,the appropriate discussion is here: Talk:Pilot licences -Lommer | ^talk 00:12, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)

TRIVIA[edit]

Some early Pilot Licenses were signed by the Wright Brothers. They did not have an expiration or renewal date. They are considered valuable historic documents. Unlike current issue, the FAA may not take these licenses from the owner.

So the lincence is an original without a expiration or renewal date? Mkhumo (talk) 06:58, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The actual ordinal number for Wilbur and Orville Wright Aero Club of America source found[edit]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aero_Club_of_America shows 04 for Orville and 05 for Wilbur. But still a citation is needed to confirm.Joefaust (talk) 22:58, 2 July 2010 (UTC) Reference was found. Page 62 of Aero Club of America[reply]

Merge with Private Pilot License[edit]

The merge tag has been up for almost a year directing people to this talk page, and there has been no discussion here. I oppose the merge, unless Commercial Pilot License and Airline Transport Pilot License were also merged, and all the information was retained. Even then, I see no particular reason to do that. I will remove the tag in a few weeks if no one comments. 24.20.131.232 (talk) 19:07, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose merge. Certification by other corporations, sports association, hang glider pilots' clubs, etc. is so starkly different from national certification in some historical and practical scenes. In USA, there is no license for hang glider pilots, although various clubs and associations rate pilots according to different systems for a kind of certification and rating. Joefaust (talk) 02:14, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As a pilot what kind of subject do you have to do in high school? Mkhumo (talk) 06:56, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Suspension/revocation via administrative vs. judiciary action?[edit]

Can someone cite the source for this statement near the beginning of the article? Is it true worldwide, or just in certain countries? (I've never heard of this before.) Thank you. Jim Ward (talk·stalk) 16:57, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Non FAA license requirements[edit]

The article seems very FAA-centric, when it comes to requirements for certain licenses and ratings. These are somewhat different (especially time-wise) under JAA jurisdiction. Just as an example - 200 (instead of 250) hours are required for CPL. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.64.160.88 (talk) 00:16, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pilot and certificate[edit]

How do you apply for being a pilot if you have a degree and come from another country ? Mkhumo (talk) 06:48, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Attempt to make the page more international[edit]

Since this page is very FAA/USA focussed with just a few references to other CAA's or practices, I would like to rewrite this page with the ICAO Annex 1 Standards and Recommended Practices as the basic guidance. Of course differences for different countries can be included as well. If you're familiar with ICAO Annex 1, feel free to help out. I was thinking to include differences to FAA and EASA licences, but the basic should be ICAO. This is the most recent version of Annex 1 that I could find on the web, the newest version is payware only... Maybe a title change to "Flight Crew Licensing" would be appropriate as well. Callingcasa (talk) 13:46, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]