Talk:Foreign relations of Argentina

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Comments[edit]

Money-laundering center? What a lie, there aren't even stable banks in Argentina.

True a few years ago. There are now. And money laundry is not done through banks. There are some very old, stable illegal businesses in Argentina that every authority is well aware of. --Pablo D. Flores 19:48, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Sadly, Pablo is right. Money-laundring became rampant in the 1990's, now I'd like to think it has decreased, though. There are sadly many examples of this being done through "legitimate" bussinesses. *cough* *cough* --Lobizón 01:47, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It depends on what "stable" means, actually the banking system itself is quite robust and has to comply with anti-money laudering legislation. What is bad in Argentina is how economy as a whole is handled. Regards, DPdH (talk) 00:20, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

¿POV?[edit]

"supporting the U.S. campaign to improve human rights in Cuba"

Wether you believe it is like that or not, you can't affirm that the United States is campaigning for improving human rights in Cuba in a neutral encyclopedia. It is evident that the only thing the U.S. has on Cuba are political concerns. Apart from that, the U.S. has the Guantánamo base in Cuba, where human rights are all but taken into account.

The last part is a tu quoque ("you too") fallacy. Any country can improve things abroad while leaving their own businesses unattended. Anyway, the whole article was very POV when it came to the US (what else would you expect from a CIA report?) so I tried to fix that. Now that the page is more or less in shape, however...

... it needs much more detail (for example, recent history of the relationship with Brazil, past wars, a list of litigious points with Chile, etc.). --Pablo D. Flores 19:48, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)

clean up[edit]

The article is clean enough, although some earlier history will be welcome Jor70 12:06, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Uruguay Relations[edit]

Should the confilict about those paper factories between Argentina and Uruguay be mentioned in the article? Seems their relations have been pretty tense recently. --HJV 23:15, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In my opinion, the ongoing paper factory dispute is crucial for illustrating how Kirschner's domestic populism at times leads him to adopt contentious foreign policy positions. Lol, I would sign my name but can't find the tilda on these Argentine keyboards.

Restructure Article?[edit]

I would favor a section on Menem's Presidency, that of De La Rua and the 2001-2002 crisis, and then another section on Kirschner.

A first one before Menem would be needed too.- (Jor70 22:35, 16 May 2006 (UTC))[reply]
I believe the article should start with the Colonial era, describe the foreign relationships during the 1800s, specially that with the United Kingdom, and then the modern era, with United States of America and other gobal main powers. Of course, the last military government could have its own section, though it shouldn't overlap too much with other articles such as Dirty War and Falklands War. Policies of the recent governments of Alfonsin, Menem, etc, could be squeezed in one section, perhaps two, carefully not overlaping (too much) with the Crisis article. I wouldn't go too deep on ever 'event' but more in the general position. Mariano(t/c) 09:55, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Headline text[edit]

How do Argentines view afro Americans in United States? How do they view relationships out side their race? What do they think about marriage and family outside their culture. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.188.36.130 (talk) 17:12, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Importance of "Argentina-Mongolia relations"?[edit]

Hi, I believe that the section Argentina-Mongolia relations is irrelevant and should be removed. Rationale: Argentina has diplomatic relations with heaps of countries (actually I believe "all" countries, but don't have a verifiable source, yet) and there are no specific sections for all them. Only relevant issues in Argentina's foreign relations should have a section of their own.
If nobody reasonably opposes my proposal, I'll remove the mentioned section (and will cite the appropriate wikipolicy supporting that action!).
Kind regards, DPdH (talk) 23:58, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Do it, it sounds to me like a man bites dog kind of article inclusion.Brutaldeluxe (talk) 00:03, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed. Way too random. Noble-savage (talk) 01:30, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Jor70 was faster than me, and already deleted that section. 8) Cheers, DPdH (talk)

full trust of the Chilean political class[edit]

Is there any closer reference to add to this paragraph ? most seems to be from 1990s. --Jor70 (talk) 00:19, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed WikiProject - Bilateral relations[edit]

There is now a upstart WikiProject to establish a concensus about WP's International bilateral relations articles, including "X-Y (country) relations" articles, at Wikipedia:Centralized discussion/Bilateral international relations. Interested parties should add their names at Wikipedia:WikiProject International relations/Bilateral relations task force if they wish to play a part in the discussions or have an Interest in this going forward. Thank you for your attention. CaribDigita (talk) 23:18, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merging graph and external links to this page[edit]

I would like to merge much of the large graph into a subsection of this graph.

this is the result of comprimise between editors at Wikipedia:WikiProject International relations/Bilateral relations task force. Any objections from those who regularly edit here? Ikip (talk) 17:47, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:12 EC-Guemes.jpg Nominated for Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:12 EC-Guemes.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests January 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 15:12, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

malvinas or falklands in this article[edit]

As per these 2 recent changes by user 2.99.80.248:

has this been discussed before on this talk page? Has consensus on this been previously reached? Cheers, Azylber (talk) 10:11, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The system used is "Falkland Islands (Spanish: Islas Malvinas)". See the guideline Falkland Islands Cambalachero (talk) 13:51, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Fantastic. Thank you! Azylber (talk) 14:26, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Argentine gov't public opinion and foreign policy[edit]

I have the impression that right now, though I think the government is maybe moderate, argentine public opinion right now - especially the younger generation - is very heavily against, even hostile to, not only the english, but also the west in general, particularly EEUU (united states). does this public opinion has it influenced the last elections and will influence future ones?

however, I also think that argentines do not seem to like venezuela as well either (maybe because the mestizo population).

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 13 external links on Foreign relations of Argentina. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:25, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Add citations[edit]

I'm working on an assignment for a class I'm in, and as part of that class, I had to look at a wikipedia article in the area of US-Latin relations. I noticed this article makes heavy use of Wiki citations, but neglects to cite a reputable outside source at least once a paragraph. That's something that should be addressed.

Jgriffith19 (talk) 16:20, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

History Page Organization[edit]

The history section could use some cleanup on the organization front, and it perhaps would benefit from more detail on policy passed by the government at the time.

Jgriffith19 (talk) 16:25, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 31 external links on Foreign relations of Argentina. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:39, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nicaragua not on map[edit]

Anyone know why Nicaragua is gray on the map? The table shows normal relations between the two. --161.185.160.224 (talk) 14:45, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Foreign_relations_of_Argentina&oldid=1207266686"