Talk:Lorentz force

Presumably temporary problems

   I'm about to revert myself, and work out my confusion before next saving another revision, that should actually be better than what i found. (I'm about 50 years rusty on this, and i'd better sharing my misgivings about what i found, later in this section, before saving the fix that had seemed just around the corner.)
--Jerzy•t 05:58, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Polarization and magnetization

If the Lorentz force takes the form

$\mathbf {F} =q\mathbf {E} +q\mathbf {v} \times \mathbf {B}$

for an isolated particle, then in a material medium it should take the form

$\mathbf {f} =\rho \mathbf {E} +\mathbf {J} \times \mathbf {B}$

where: f is the density of force; ρ is the density of total charge; and J is the density of total current. What if we then separate the total charge and current into their free and bound parts?

From the article on Polarization density, we have

$\rho =\rho _{f}-\nabla \cdot \mathbf {P}$

where: ρ_f is the density of free charge; and P is the polarization density. And we also have

$\mathbf {J} =\mathbf {J} _{f}+\nabla \times \mathbf {M} +{\frac {\partial \mathbf {P} }{\partial t}}$

where: J_f is the density of free current; and M is the density of magnetization.

If we put these together, we get

$\mathbf {f} =(\rho _{f}-\nabla \cdot \mathbf {P} )\mathbf {E} +(\mathbf {J} _{f}+\nabla \times \mathbf {M} +{\frac {\partial \mathbf {P} }{\partial t}})\times \mathbf {B}$.

Should this not be in the article? JRSpriggs (talk) 21:02, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lorentz force. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090226225302/http://www.nadn.navy.mil/Users/physics/tank/Public/FaradaysLaw.pdf to http://www.nadn.navy.mil/Users/physics/tank/Public/FaradaysLaw.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:59, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

Force on a current-carrying wire - SeVeN uP rule

A mnemonic for remembering the direction of the force resulting from ev x B is Seven Up. Imagine yourself on the particle going through the magnetic field forwards into the screen, that is the direction of 'V'. If the direction of B is 'S'outh <--- 'N'orth (i.e. right to left - magnetic field lines point north to south), the force is uP for a Positive particle (the same as for a conventional current) and dowN for a Negative particle. This spells out SVN (seven) and uP/dowN. The v in the middle represents the fact that the particle is moving through the magnetic field (S<-N). I think this is more memorable than all the rules with hands (right or left? which finger for which thing?) Acorrector (talk) 17:07, 3 May 2020 (UTC)