Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David neill

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Joyous 17:36, Jan 29, 2005 (UTC)

David neill[edit]

Not notable. Thue | talk 14:00, 23 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Delete. Not notable or hoax. jni 14:10, 23 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Delete for reasons above. -- Hoary 14:26, 2005 Jan 23 (UTC)
Delete. I agree.—Pt_(T) 14:27, 23 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Delete, not notable, possible vanity, un-encyclopaedic. Megan1967 02:10, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Delete -- not notable. Longhair 10:20, 27 Jan 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.