Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peev
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez 03:24, May 18, 2005 (UTC)
Peev[edit]
Apparent nonsense (wouldn't a minus sign do the job?). Delete. — JIP | Talk 08:40, 12 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I never heard of a 'peev'. Thue | talk 09:28, 12 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - nonsense. Jitse Niesen 23:18, 12 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - gibbersih. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson 19:15, 13 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Colleauges, I am repulsed by your juvenile sense of mathametics. A PEEV is one of our century's greatest mathametical discoveries. Shame on you for dishonoring it. -Professor Wachner-Solomon University of Stockholm
- The above comment was made by User:129.133.4.36 at 17:50, 15 May 2005. Said user is also the author of the article to be deleted. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson 00:52, 16 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I agree, politely, with Wachner-Solomon. Perhaps it is only common in European usage? - Professor Shestakofsky, University of Salzberg
- No, it is not. I did not encounter it even at the maths department of the University of Salzburg (note the spelling), nor did I have the pleasure of meeting a prof. Shestakofsky. -- Jitse Niesen (a European), 10:40, 16 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Nonsense--Heathcliff 04:43, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.