Highland Railway River Class

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

HR ‘River’ class
CR 938 class
Type and origin
Power typeSteam
DesignerF. G. Smith
BuilderHawthorn Leslie and Company
Serial number3095–3100
Build date1915
Total produced6
Specifications
Configuration:
 • Whyte4-6-0
Gauge4 ft 8+12 in (1,435 mm) standard gauge
Leading dia.3 ft 3 in (0.991 m)
Driver dia.6 ft 0 in (1.829 m)
Loco weight72 long tons 6 cwt (162,000 lb or 73.5 t)
Boiler5 ft 1+1316 in (1.57 m) diameter
Boiler pressure160 psi (1.10 MPa)
Heating surface:
 • Flues25.3 sq ft (2.35 m2)
 • Total surface1,599 sq ft (148.6 m2)
Superheater:
 • TypeRobinson, 24 element
 • Heating area350 sq ft (33 m2)
CylindersTwo, outside
Cylinder size21 in × 28 in (533 mm × 711 mm)
Valve gearWalschaerts
Valve type10-inch (254 mm) piston valves
Performance figures
Tractive effort23,324 lbf (103.8 kN)
Career
OperatorsHRCRLMS
ClassHR: River
CR: 938
Power classLMS: 4P
Withdrawn1939–1946
DispositionAll scrapped

The Highland Railway River class was a class of steam locomotive with a 4-6-0 wheel arrangement. They were designed by F. G. Smith, who had joined the Highland Railway in 1904 from the North Eastern Railway. His initial post was as manager of the Locomotive, Carriage and Wagon works at Inverness (usually referred to as Lochgorm works). When Peter Drummond departed to the Glasgow and South Western Railway at the end of 1911 Smith was appointed Chief Mechanical Engineer in his place.

Delivery to Highland Railway[edit]

The 'Rivers' were Smith's only design for the Highland Railway, and they were the largest and most powerful locomotives built for that company. This involved a deadweight driving axle loading of 17.75 long tons (18.03 t; 19.88 short tons), which exceeded the maximum axle loading allowed by the company's Civil Engineer. However, Smith had taken this into account, and had designed the 'Rivers' to cause much lower 'hammer blow' upon the track than the existing Highland locomotives. When the effects of hammer blow were taken into account, the 'Rivers' put the same total weight onto the track as the previous 'Castle' Class 4-6-0s.

The first two engines were delivered to Perth around the end of August 1915, when a row immediately erupted between Smith and the company's Chief Civil Engineer Alexander Newlands. Smith and Newlands had a difficult working relationship and avoided speaking to one another. It seems that Smith had not discussed the high deadweight axle loadings with Newlands, and Newlands did not raise the matter until the locomotives arrived. On delivery, the locomotives were immediately placed in a siding while the engineers checked the drawings. Once this exercise was completed Newlands banned them from the line as being too heavy for a number of bridges and out of gauge. Smith argued that the effect of hammer blow needed to be taken into account, but the company's board sided with Newlands and Smith was forced to resign.

Sale to Caledonian Railway[edit]

The Highland managed to sell all six locomotives to the Caledonian Railway, and legend has it that they made a profit of £500 per engine in the process. They were out of gauge to the 'Caley' as well, but the modifications required were slight and quickly made.

In Caledonian service they proved reliable and were well liked by their crews, despite their being outside-cylindered and the 'Caley' being an inside-cylinder line. They spent most of their lives on fast goods between Aberdeen and Carlisle. Many footplatemen and shed mechanical staff regarded them as being better than the Caley's own 4-6-0 designs.

LMS service[edit]

By the 1920s, the effects of hammer blow were more widely understood, and it was accepted that the locomotives could safely work over the Highland Main Line. In fact, taking hammer blow into account, the total weight which the 'Rivers' put onto the track was around a ton less than the 'Clan' 4-6-0s which had been built to replace them. Some of the weaker bridges on the Highland had, in any event, been strengthened by that time. Thus the 'Rivers' ended their days on the line for which they had originally been built. The last of the class was withdrawn in 1946.

Numbers and names[edit]

Planned numbers and names in Highland service were

Table of locomotives[1]
HR no. HR name CR no. LMS no. Works Built Withdrawn
70 River Ness 938 14756 Hawthorn Leslie 3095 September 1915 October 1939
71 River Spey 939 14757 Hawthorn Leslie 3096 September 1915 December 1936
(72) (River Tay) 940 14758 Hawthorn Leslie 3097 November 1915 September 1945
(73) (River Findhorn) 941 14759 Hawthorn Leslie 3098 November 1915 February 1939
(74) (River Garry) 942 14760 Hawthorn Leslie 3099 December 1915 December 1946
(75) (River Tummel) 943 14761 Hawthorn Leslie 3100 December 1915 October 1939

References[edit]

  1. ^ "BritishSteam locomotive information". BritishSteam.com. Archived from the original on 4 April 2013. Retrieved 26 May 2013.
  • Baxter, Bertram (1984). Baxter, David (ed.). British Locomotive Catalogue 1825–1923, Volume 4: Scottish and remaining English Companies in the LMS Group. Ashbourne, Derbyshire: Moorland Publishing Company. pp. 102–103, 201.
  • Casserley, H. C. & Johnston, Stuart W. (1974) [1966]. Locomotives at the Grouping 3: London, Midland and Scottish Railway. Shepperton, Surrey: Ian Allan. p. 151. ISBN 0-7110-0554-0.
  • Vallance, H. A. (1938). The Highland Railway
  • Vaughan, Adrian. (2003). Railway Blunders