Talk:KDE Display Manager

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the KDE Display Manager article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Computing: Software / Free and open-source software Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.
	This article is supported by Free and open-source software (assessed as Low-importance).

Untitled[edit]

er....what? Kingturtle 00:21, 15 Oct 2003 (UTC)

My thoughts exactly. Angela 00:24, Oct 15, 2003 (UTC)

I tried to make it more understandable. (There was little context given and three unexplained TLAs in the first sentence.) --Mrwojo 02:31, 15 Oct 2003 (UTC)

Request to share the acronym[edit]

There is a new specification from the Object Management Group, which also has the acronym KDM - Knowledge Discovery Metamodel. How about we create a root KDM node what will have links to both KDE Display Manager and Knowledge Discovery Metamodel? Any objections or concerns ? Equilibrioception 22:04, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I have done the relocation of the page KDM to "KDE Display Manager" and have corrected all references to avoid double redirection. The new KDM page is now shared by both "KDM"s. I have accidentaly created an extra page "KDM Display Manager", so please help me remove it. Thanks.

Inherent insecurity[edit]

KDM has an optional autologin feature; despite the inherent insecurity of this, users sometimes request it.

I do not see why this should be "inherently insecure". For instance, on a virtual machine there are no security concerns and the login box is only a nuisance. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fph (talk • contribs) 16:41, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]