User talk:MS123

Image source

Discussion moved to Image talk:Austr.JPG#Copright.

Misc

MS, thanks for your comments. I've responded on my taklk page. Kevintoronto 21:00, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Election maps

Yes, I have noticed your maps. I did notice they were more difficult to read. (partly my fault as the key you borrowed off of me had the NDP colours to dark) I have since lightened the NDP colours in the key. Anyways, I would be happy to change them when I get some time. I have the Quebec map on the go at the moment. Here's a tip if you want to create more maps: save them as PNG instead of JPEG. Thanks! - Earl Andrew 01:59, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Ahh, I didn't notice the colour change. Unfortunately they are too grainy for me to use. -- Earl Andrew - talk 03:00, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)

The Manitoba map is complete. I created a new colour for 70+ because there were none uner 40%. Working on Manitoba 1999 since its the same boundaries. - -- Earl Andrew - talk 08:08, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)

I wasn't planning on it, as I do not believe there are maps on the internet. However, I may be able to find such maps at the library (I was making Ottawa election maps (showing wards) today) if you really want me to make them. -- Earl Andrew - talk 02:50, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)

If I am going to go through the trouble of getting the maps, I might as well do them myself. :) -- Earl Andrew - talk 03:49, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Hey there again. Just letting you know, I just made a map for the 1990 Ontario election. 1995 & 1987 coming soon. -- Earl Andrew - talk 08:24, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)

The orange is trully spectacular! It's too bad Bob Rae turned out to be Ontario's version of Jimmy Carter. -- Earl Andrew - talk 20:57, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)

---

Hey M123. I don't think I'm being hypocritical at all. The original discussions were that with some of the colour choices, the text is not readable, especially when you consider that other parties have different colours. The grey is a compromise. The grey as chosen leads to legible text, hence it is used. The various political parties use different colours which makes it very hard to read the text that comes with it. Take a look at our previous discussion and see what you think. --Deathphoenix 23:17, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Hey M123, I appreciate your work on this. Your example for white text works out fine for the Liberal colour, but I'm not sure if such a system is workable because of the variations of colour for the different political parties. What if one had a light tan colour, or maybe yellow? The text wouldn't work out too well in those cases. We went with templates so we could easily change colours and the whole thing will work out fine with minimal tweaking. Moving the colours away from the text was supposed to fix all that without having the compromise on the colour (since we initially discussed using lighter pastel colours instead of the current colour scheme). --Deathphoenix 00:53, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for your update to the maps. I did nto know you did them outside of the Yukon. I'm curious as to if you'd be willing to work with me and Earl Andrew to try and get as many maps as we can get for as many elections as we can. I'd be willing to do what I can to draw borders if you and earl can do the colouring and shading. If your interested, I'll leave a similar message on his talk page Pellaken 15:44, 26 October 2005 (UTC)

Party images

Yes, and your point? I don't see the problem really. I could do them, but the colouring may be a little off. -- Earl Andrew - talk 21:32, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Parliament seats images

Hi. I notice you've uploaded a large number of images relating to the Canadian parliaments after previous Canadian efforts. While this is appreciated, you appear to be unaware of Wikipedia's image copyright tagging policy. On behalf of the Wikipedia community, I'd urge you to give this policy a quick review and tag your images appropriately. Thanks! -- Grunt 🇪🇺 03:47, 2005 Apr 12 (UTC)

Ontario compass

Well, I figured they were more moderate, because Hampton is a former Rae cabinet minister, also they have more seats than the federal NDP- which indicates moderation. -- Earl Andrew - talk 05:33, 24 May 2005 (UTC)

OK, good point. I shall move it.

Fixed -- Earl Andrew - talk 05:50, 24 May 2005 (UTC)

poll chart

Updated. All I can say is, wow. -- Earl Andrew - talk 04:49, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Yukon elections

The only place on the web that would have info is Elections Yukon, but they only have the 2002 results. I do have the results for the 1996 election on a spreadsheet (I was a candidate), but I cannot vouch for their accuracy. It was pretty cool as in Old Crow, Yukon there was a tie that was broken by lot. If you want, I could send it to you. Drop me an email if you want it. You can find the address on my web page which is linked on my wikipedia user page. I could try getting paper copies of the previous election reports from election Yukon & mail them to you, but it might be faster for you to contact them directly.Luigizanasi 21:08, 27 August 2005 (UTC)

On your question about Jack Cable being the leader. During the 1996 election, Ken Taylor (who ran in Mount Lorne) was the leader. After he was defeated, Jack became the leader until Pat Duncan took over, if I remeber correctly. I hope you got my email. Luigizanasi 07:52, 28 August 2005 (UTC)

Thanx for adding our Riding Projection this week. It generated activity at our website. We will be adding data to the graph later this week.--FreddyH> 07:58, 5 September 2005 (UTC)

You might be interested in yesterday's release of a poll by DataPath: NDP 43%, YP 30% & Lib 21%. NDP strength in Whitehorse was NDP 44%, YP 27% and Lib 23%. Also, Hoakie Arntsen resigned. Fun times.Luigizanasi 00:26, 9 September 2005 (UTC)

You asked me how may years I spent in school. Well, I started grade 1 in 1962 (no kindergarden) and finsished my Master's at McGill in 1981. So that adds up to 19 years. As I was born and grew up in Montreal: seven years elementary school, four years high school, two years CEGEP, three years to get my BA, a qualifyinhg year after that before entering grad school, and three or four years to finish my masters.Luigizanasi 06:16, 10 September 2005 (UTC)

We've done a massive poll - 459 yukoners: YP 35%, NDP 34%, L 29% & INDEP'T 1% --FreddyH> 07:14, 10 September 2005 (UTC)

I'm kinda short of time, preparing release of part IV of our yukon poll; if u email me fred@trendlines.ca i have some new data that u can post. --FreddyH> 06:00, 15 September 2005 (UTC)

Vancouver municipal election

<form letter> I've posted something that may be of interest to you at Wikipedia:Canadian wikipedians' notice board/discussion#Vancouver municipal election. Hope you can comment there. </form letter> -The Tom 22:14, 29 September 2005 (UTC)

Election images status?

I've notice some images that have been uploaded by you that have no copyright status, which I believe you made yourself. Could you please tag them with the {{GFDL}} or the {{PD-release}} tag, before the evil speedy deletion people come a-knocking and make them disappear? The images in question are the following:

• Image:Cdn1867.PNG
• Image:Cdn1872.PNG
• Image:Cdn1874.PNG
• Image:Cdn1878.PNG
• Image:Cdn1882.PNG
• Image:Cdn1887.PNG
• Image:Cdn1896.PNG
• Image:Cdn1900.PNG

Thank you. --Bash 22:40, 8 October 2005 (UTC)

MS, the 1900 chart shows 3 Labour and 1 Independent, while the table at Canadian federal election, 1900 reports 1 Independent Labour (colour: gray) and 5 other Independents. Do you know why there is a discrepancy? Thanks. Ground Zero | t 20:49, 12 October 2005 (UTC)

Seating plan

MS, I am so sorry to have upset you. I really did not mean to. I admire your work. The only issue for me -- and for some of the others -- is where it should go, not whether it should be included or not. You make worthwhile contributions here. We are only trying to make sure that the articles work the same way that other Wikipedia articles do for consistency and ease of use of the encyclopedia. We are with you, not against you. (Well, I guess some people are against you, but that may have more to do with your behaviour in the pub than here. ;-) ) Regards, Ground Zero | t 21:41, 13 October 2005 (UTC)

I dont have any seating plans for the house of commons, but I am familiar with the parliamentary tradition under which the seats are distributed. I will explain it:

begin on the government benches. begin at the speaker. fill up as many goverment seats as possible. Under a majority, you will reach the end. If this happens, next, you move to the opposition benches. The government again starts at the speaker, and goes down the benches as far as it will stretch. Next is the official opposition, followed by other opposition parties. Independents can be shuffled around to make seating simple, but in general, they go in the last seats. In the event the opposition has so few seats, that the leader of the opposition could not sit across from the prime minister, then the government can hold seats on the opposition benches both nearest to the speaker, and farther from the speaker, such as exists currently in the canadian senate. Though this should not be an issue except possibly in 1984 and 1957.

hope this helps.

Pellaken 21:32, 21 October 2005 (UTC)

the images above have the government starting away from the speaker on the opposition benches. This is incorrect. Pellaken 21:42, 21 October 2005 (UTC)

all of them

   * Image:Cdn1867.PNG
   * Image:Cdn1872.PNG
   * Image:Cdn1874.PNG
   * Image:Cdn1878.PNG
   * Image:Cdn1882.PNG
   * Image:Cdn1887.PNG
   * Image:Cdn1896.PNG
   * Image:Cdn1900.PNG

the government party starts at the speaker when on the opposition benches, not away from the speaker.

- in Ontario, perhaps. but federally this is the tradition. Look at PEI's legislature for example, in PEI it's never been an issue or never been challenged. Federally, however, this is the traditional way that seats are distributed. If possible I will find old images of old question periods on tape going back as far as I can to prove such. Traditionally the government (as the first to choose which seats it wants) picks the seats, on the opposition benches, closest to the speaker. The government could, if it so chose, spread itself our like a checker board, but it's traditionally chosen its seats in this manner. This was started in the 1800's when sitting near to the speaker was a privilidge as there were no micraphones and speakers. Pellaken 03:59, 23 October 2005 (UTC)

I will be honest, I did not really read what you sent me, but at your instance, I skimmed it now. From what I've skimmed, you may in fact be right. I will examine it, word for word :P and come back here. It appears as though in the past this may have been done. This does raise a point, this MPP got his data from somewhere... somewhere WE may want to look into ourselvs. IMHO it would be a benifit to wikipedia for our images to be as correct as possible. It may be in our interests to contact the MPP. as I live in Toronto, I am willing to do so. Pellaken 05:18, 24 October 2005 (UTC)

From the data I can find in that, it appears as though prior to the 1960's, the norm was to have them sitting away from the speaker, while after that (norabally with the 35th parliament) the norm is to have them sitting closer to the speaker.

From this - http://www.parl.gc.ca/information/about/process/house/GeneralInformation/SeatingPlan.pdf - it appears as though a total of 160 seats can be easily fit into one side of the house. Logically, if you change the two desk rows to three desk rows (not unheard of in canada) you could presumadably fit more. It appears, from the information I can find, that in the past, when the government won more then 50% of the seats, that it simpally added more desks on the government side, and had less on the opposition side. Something like the "empty back row" in the Ontario legislature. Pellaken 18:42, 24 October 2005 (UTC)

Party logos

I know User:Pellaken had found some old logos, and made a chart from it, but I have been unable to find it. I already asked him for it again a few months ago, and I think it might be tedious to ask him again. Anyways, thanks for the link, although I am not sure how to change it from that, or if it is even accurate (link is from 1988, as opposed to the convention in 1968). -- Earl Andrew - talk 23:11, 15 October 2005 (UTC)

I found them actually, here: http://img108.exs.cx/img108/2862/logos.gif Although they do not coincide with the link you gave me :( -- Earl Andrew - talk 23:23, 15 October 2005 (UTC)

my 1993 PC logo is incorrect. as is my 1988 liberal logo. Other then that, as far as I know, all are correct. Unfortunatly I no longer have copies of the proper logos. Pellaken 21:40, 21 October 2005 (UTC)

• The 1979 and 1980 PC logos are incorrect. That was the party logo, not the party's campaign logo. The campaign logo was a thin red band on top of a thinner white band on top of a thick blue band. At the right end of the series of bands, the red band was extended up at a 30 degree angle (or so) to form an broad arrow with three points. In the centre of the arrow was a white maple leaf in the form of the one on the Canadian flag. Also, the 1984 Liberal logo was the one shown in the link above as the 1988 logo, but with the word "Turner" running up the left side, at least early in the campaign when they thought he would be an asset, rather than a liability. The 1988 logo I think was the "exploding maple leaf" one, i.e., a maple leaf without a stem at the centre, and beams extending out in line with the three principlal parts of the leaf. Ground Zero | t 15:57, 26 October 2005 (UTC)

Map colours

Hi, I noticed you changed the colours a bit on my maps. Unfortunately, I think you made the NDP 60+ look a bit closer to the Liberals 50-60, which makes it harder to read. Do you think we can work on fixing that? -- Earl Andrew - talk 10:43, 2 November 2005 (UTC)

hmm, must be the way it was saved. Oh well. -- Earl Andrew - talk 03:48, 3 November 2005 (UTC)

Graphic of Commons from elections pages

Hi. Been working in the Wiki Electoral Project and looking for a way to visually tot up the composition of the BC legislature following various elections; been looking at doing it with a table in some way, but wondering as an alternative if you had any specific graphic parameters for the Commons-seats PNG you created? Best if I were to do a graphic to follow existing visual styles, if I do it that way at all; still fidgeting over figuring wikitables out and think it can be done, but....Skookum1 07:01, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

Manitoba Political Map

Are you going to update the Manitoba political seat chart now that the bye-election is complete? Great work. jdobbin 01:57, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

Peter Jenkins

You seem to be the only one who know's about yukon politics. I'm wondering why Jenkins quit the party that, at one time, he was the only MLA for? Pellaken 14:03, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:WendyMakkena.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:WendyMakkena.jpg. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to indicate why we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies under Wikipedia's fair use guidelines, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you want the image to be deleted, tag it as {{db-unksource}}.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have any concerns, contact the bot's owner: Carnildo.

Saskatchewan map

I need data, and a map of the ridings. (unless they didn't change). -- Earl Andrew - talk 07:25, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Cdn1904.PNG

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Cdn1904.PNG. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.

Image Tagging Image:Cdn1908.PNG

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Cdn1908.PNG. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.

Image Tagging Image:Cdn1911.PNG

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Cdn1911.PNG. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Shyam ^(T/C) 15:01, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

Parliament images

Hi. In the discussion to make List of Canadian federal parliaments a featured article, a minor debate is brewing about your images of the parliaments seats, and I thought you might want to weigh in on the discussion. --Arctic Gnome 04:37, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

Image:Austr.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Austr.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. BigDT 14:26, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

Commons seating plans information

I was just wondering if the Commons seating plans are based on actual seating arrangements or hypothetical, because the current seating plan has two Tories and an NDPer on the opposition benches. Now given the choice between a not-so-accurate schematic diagram and an accurate picture, I'd actually perfer some slight artistic license because it more clearly illustrates the party standings, and the diagrams don't indicate actual members so it's unlikely that anyone's going to use them to look up the actual seat arrangements.

Nonetheless, I am curious about your methods, especially for the diagrams that stretch further back in time.

And maybe you can explain why those poor Tory and Dipper saps ended up on the wrong side of the room.  ;)

Just for fun, here's what the actual seating arrangement would look like:

Kelvinc 09:25, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

The seating plans that are displayed on wikipedia are supposed to be representative of how the House of Commons appeared at the time of the election. We do generally change it, and I cannot think of a reason currently as to why we would change it. Furthermore, your colour choices for the seating plan on your "revised" version is completely wrong in regards to the parties' actual official colours and those that are on all the other parliamentary images. I now request that you revert your modification to this image to the way that it was before you tampered with it. Thank you.

Grizzwald 17:25, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Party logos

I see that some of your party logos have been deleted from election articles on the basis that Wikipedia's approach to copyright does not permit "decorative uses". I have added the logos to the party articles where I think we can justify their use better. I would hate to see these images lost. Thanks again for creating the. See Liberal Party of Canada, New Democratic Party, Bloc Québécois, Progressive Conservative Party of Canada and Social Credit Party of Canada. Regards, Ground Zero | t 04:55, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Ccflogo.PNG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Ccflogo.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 17:28, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Cdn1980.PNG

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Cdn1980.PNG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. MER-C 11:12, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Ccflogo.PNG

Thanks for uploading Image:Ccflogo.PNG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 16:27, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Ccflogo.PNG

Thanks for uploading Image:Ccflogo.PNG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:27, 16 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 16:27, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

1980 Canadian House of Commons seating chart

Hey, some users are trying to get rid of Image:Cdn1980.PNG, which you uploaded. It looks like you put all of the other seating plans that you made into the public domain, so if you meant this image in the PD as well, could you please clarify the copyright status. Thanks. --Arctic Gnome (talk • contribs) 06:11, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Ndp header.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Ndp header.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:59, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:PC80s.PNG)

Thanks for uploading Image:PC80s.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aksibot 20:18, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Pc70s.PNG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Pc70s.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aksibot 20:20, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Cdn1980.PNG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Cdn1980.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aksibot 09:58, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Bq90s.PNG

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Bq90s.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 18:03, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:NONDP.PNG

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:NONDP.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:51, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Sc70s.PNG

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Sc70s.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 21:53, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Saskndp.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Saskndp.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:12, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Ndp90s.PNG

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Ndp90s.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:26, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Ndp80s.PNG

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Ndp80s.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:27, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Ndp70s.PNG

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Ndp70s.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:27, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Ndp ns.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Ndp ns.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:27, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Lib90s.PNG

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Lib90s.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:00, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Lib80s.PNG

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Lib80s.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:00, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Lib70s.PNG

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Lib70s.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:01, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Ontndp.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Ontndp.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:45, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Saskndp.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Saskndp.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:29, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:NONDP.PNG

Thanks for uploading Image:NONDP.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:57, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Ndp70s.PNG

Thanks for uploading Image:Ndp70s.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:21, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

1972 Canadian House of Commons seating chart

In the 1972 election, one candidate of the independent candidates elected was Lucien Lamoureux, the Speaker. He held that title before the election and kept it until 1974. He ran "with no affiliation" in 1972. Shouldn't the chart be modified to take this into account? The speaker "square" on the chart should I Think be gray; one of the SoCred seats would therefore be red; and the seat currently gray on the liberal side of the house would be green. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.70.30.177 (talk) 01:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:Canadian politics/party colours/Liberals/colhead

A tag has been placed on Template:Canadian politics/party colours/Liberals/colhead requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 16:01, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Cdn1921.PNG

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Cdn1921.PNG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. →Christian.И 09:36, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Note: Has been fixed now. Regards, →Christian.И 15:45, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Canadian Parliament after 2008 election.PNG

Thanks for uploading Image:Canadian Parliament after 2008 election.PNG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 07:53, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

Template

A template you created, Template:Canadian politics/party colours/Liberals/colhead, has been marked for deletion as a deprecated and orphaned template. If, after 14 days, there has been no objection, the template will be deleted. If you wish to object to its deletion, please list your objection here and feel free to remove the {{deprecated}} tag from the template. If you feel the deletion is appropriate, no further action is necessary. Thanks for your attention. R'n'B (call me Russ) 18:19, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:Ndp70s.PNG)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ndp70s.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ZooFari 02:33, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Manparl.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Manparl.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:06, 2 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:06, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Manparl2.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Manparl2.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:07, 2 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:07, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Manparl3.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Manparl3.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:07, 2 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:07, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Legendcdnele.PNG

Thank you for uploading File:Legendcdnele.PNG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:25, 13 June 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 01:25, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Pei led.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Pei led.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:41, 28 August 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:41, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Dp yukpol.PNG missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Dp yukpol.PNG is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:56, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Yukon2006pre.PNG missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Yukon2006pre.PNG is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:05, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

Seating arrangement of the Manitoba Legislature

Hi MS123, I noticed that you added an image to Legislative Assembly of Manitoba with the seating plan. This is now really behind, since the seats have changed for the different parties since then. There has been a provincial election (2007) and a resignation by a Liberal member. Please update the following image: File:Manparl3.PNG. --Skol fir (talk) 09:49, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:NONDP.PNG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:NONDP.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:34, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Ontario2011.PNG

Thanks for uploading File:Ontario2011.PNG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 01:06, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Albleg25.JPG needs authorship information

Dear uploader:

The media file you uploaded as File:Albleg25.JPG appears to be missing information as to its authorship (and or source), or if you did provide such information, it is confusing for others trying to make use of the image.

It would be appreciated if you would consider updating the file description page, to make the authorship of the media clearer.

Although some images may not need author information in obvious cases, (such where an applicable source is provided), authorship information aids users of the image, and helps ensure that appropriate credit is given (a requirement of some licenses).

• If you created this media yourself, please consider explicitly including your user name, for which: {{subst:usernameexpand|MS123}} will produce an appropriate expansion,
  or use the {{own}} template.

• If this is an old image, for which the authorship is unknown or impossible to determine, please indicate this on the file description page.

If you have any questions please see Help:File page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:37, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Canadian politics/party colours/Equality/colhead

A tag has been placed on Template:Canadian politics/party colours/Equality/colhead requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it must be substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. —Arctic Gnome (talk • contribs) 02:26, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Canadian politics/party colours/ADQ/colhead

A tag has been placed on Template:Canadian politics/party colours/ADQ/colhead requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it must be substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. —Arctic Gnome (talk • contribs) 21:00, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Ontariolegev.PNG missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Ontariolegev.PNG is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:36, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:48, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, MS123. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, MS123. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Liberal column.PNG

The file File:Liberal column.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious encyclopedic use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 3 May 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Manparl3.PNG

The file File:Manparl3.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 12 May 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Oleg90.PNG

The file File:Oleg90.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Manitoba sp.PNG

The file File:Manitoba sp.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused, low-res, no obvious use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 16:35, 14 January 2023 (UTC)