Talk:Optical phenomena
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
comment[edit]
Correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't parallax and depth of field both be optical phenomena? Koyaanis Qatsi, Sunday, July 7, 2002
I'd say so. Anything to do with light and matter. Can't think of any other xxx phenomenon they would fall under Fred Bauder
There seem to be so many articles on optics-related topics that maybe a list of optical topics is appropriate. Opinions? 131.183.85.197 20:07 Apr 21, 2003 (UTC)
To a certain extent this serves that purpose, but redundancy is alway good. By all means make one. Fred Bauder 21:06 Apr 21, 2003 (UTC)
If I work on it I will need to proceed slowly; other will have to contribute too, if it is to go beyond the somewhat stubby stage. This list comes nowhere near serving the purpose, because most of the optical topics probably would not be appropriate for inclusion here. 131.183.85.197 21:12 Apr 21, 2003 (UTC)
Was the "Fresnel reflection" effect accounted for already?
Is the bending of light caused by the eclipse or observed during the eclipse? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jody Fulford (talk • contribs) 07:13, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
Opalesence[edit]
Should it not be added? 69.132.69.87 (talk) 20:56, 31 May 2012 (UTC)