Talk:Lapis Satricanus

Classical Greece and Rome Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

"Conca"[edit]

The previous version had the stone found in "Conca, Italy"; apparently due to a misunderstanding of a text in Italian, on the part of the writer of the 1911 Britannica. "Conca" means "basin", "flat valley", etc. and is not the name of a town. The town, a very small one, was Borgo Montello as I state in the repaired version; it does in fact lie in an open valley. There is no town by the name of Conca (or Conca + something) anywhere in the Lazio, at least down to 100 or so inhabitants, and the name is unlikely. — Bill 14:20, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lapis Satricanus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050424144459/http://www.telemaco.unibo.it/rombo/iscriz/satricum.htm to http://www.telemaco.unibo.it/rombo/iscriz/satricum.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:50, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]