Talk:Peritrich

Microbiology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microbiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Microbiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MicrobiologyWikipedia:WikiProject MicrobiologyTemplate:WikiProject MicrobiologyMicrobiology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Protista

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Protista, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of protists and protistology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ProtistaWikipedia:WikiProject ProtistaTemplate:WikiProject ProtistaProtista articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Individuals animals are generally between 0.1 and 2 mm long although for those species with a highly contractile stalk, the maximum extended length can be up to 3 mm.

I'm pretty sure that many peritrichs are much smaller than this - 0.05 mm sounds typical. That's not counting the stalk, but then, not all peritrichs have stalks. I haven't been able to find any info on the full range of peritrich sizes, though. Where exactly do these numbers come from? Josh

The figures come from my own post-grad notes from the microscope when categorising the micro-fauna of activated sludges from sewage treatment plants in the London area in 1968 - 1969. The individual animals associated with the floc particles tended to be large and it is very likely that we would not have been observing many smaller cilliates. I would be happy to accept that there are many Peritichs at or smaller than 0.05mm - I don't have personal evidence for these - I was noting in this topic the unusually large maximum that has been observed. As I read my notes , many of the scale lines are against extend individuals of Vorticella and related spp . Velela 20:24, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Ok, that sounds good. I'll happily trust your maximum and put it back in the article as a note about the stalks. I still wonder what the range of size for the cells themselves is, though. Josh