This category is within the scope of WikiProject Hong Kong, a project to coordinate efforts in improving all Hong Kong-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Hong Kong-related articles, you are invited to join this project.Hong KongWikipedia:WikiProject Hong KongTemplate:WikiProject Hong KongHong Kong articles
This category is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This category was nominated for deletion, renaming, or merging with another category on 2011 January 28. The result of the discussion was no consensus.
Interesting category. I tot someone has been insisting that Hong Kong should be dealt with as thou it is a seperate country from the PRC except in areas like foreign relations and defence?--Huaiwei 23:37, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
If you want to avoid being lambasted for double stqandards, then sadly, that is exactly what you have to do. Its not like I am asking for it actually.--[ [User:Huaiwei|Huaiwei]] 6 July 2005 11:28 (UTC)
I am not sure if you are choosing to pretend to have misunderstood what I said. I said Hong Kong has autonomy over its own matters. Only diplomatic relations and national defence are the business of the Central People's Government in Beijing. I did not say no category should be created for topics related to defence of Hong Kong. — Instantnood July 6, 2005 11:49 (UTC)
Actually I do wonder who is the one feigning ignorance here. You constantly demand that HK be treated as thou it is a country in affairs which are not related to foreign affairs or the military. I would be damned if you actually dare deny this. Whatever the case, I decided to be bold and when ahead demonstrating to you what can be done pertaining to your enquiry above. What do you have to say about this?--Huaiwei 6 July 2005 13:10 (UTC)
That's your interpretation of my words. I've never expressed whether what I requested is exclusive. And afterall this category is not, at least until the time being, treated as a sovereign State or a country. — Instantnood July 6, 2005 13:34 (UTC)
Suit yourself. What is important is not what you think you are being interpreted, but what others intepret your words as. I dont see why I should waste any more time with someone who obviously shows no sense of responsibilty or accountability. This category is listed seperately in Category:Militaries with other militaries of mostly soverign states. That tells us something. Meanwhile, my concern extends to Military of Macau as well.--Huaiwei 6 July 2005 14:03 (UTC)
I guess you won't probably take up the responsibility, and be accountable to other readers, to prove I "show[s] no sense of responsilbity or accountability". Please be reminded about military of Greenland too. :-D — Instantnood July 6, 2005 14:59 (UTC)