Talk:Black Box: The Complete Original Black Sabbath 1970–1978

Clean up

Bah. Needs a more NPOV. --Keith, evil dude 00:41, 22 May 2005 (UTC)

I did what I could with this article.--Keith, evil dude 00:54, 22 May 2005 (UTC)

I overhauled the article, added some graphics, rewrote the whole thing, but I think it sounds a little like some kind of press release. I'm not sure if it's neutral enough.--72.25.9.54

I'd just like to point out that ozzy actually quit sabbath, and geezer butler soon followed, and i think ozzy quit in 1978. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Looloopoo9 (talk • contribs) 09:35, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

Um, no, Ozzy was fired. It is well documented and referenced. Bill Ward has stated in many interviews that he always felt guilty that it was him that told Ozzy that he was fired even though it was Tony Iommi's decision. Fair Deal (talk) 10:52, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Blackbox.jpg

Image:Blackbox.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 14:36, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:BlackSabbathTechnicalEcstasy.jpg

Image:BlackSabbathTechnicalEcstasy.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 14:39, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:BlackSabbathSabotage.jpg

Image:BlackSabbathSabotage.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 14:39, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:BlackSabbathNeverSayDie!.jpg

Image:BlackSabbathNeverSayDie!.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 14:40, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Black Sabbath Vol 4.png

Image:Black Sabbath Vol 4.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 14:46, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:SabbathBox.jpg

Image:SabbathBox.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:27, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Remastering

While I expect the Rhino is closer to the master tape and (presuming it hasn't been fiddled with) probably more true to the original recording, a source is needed for "noticeably superior to the Castle discs".

Here's a site that compares the Castle and Rhino boxes: http://www.geocities.com/SunsetStrip/Backstage/1303/sv06.htm . Because it is a Geocities page (and therefore self-published), it probably cannot be included as a reliable source. Online fan chatter I've heard describes the Castle as "warmer" and the Rhino as "brighter", which could be from tape generations or just EQ. Both releases are said to be comparable in terms of "clarity" (whatever that means) and headroom.

It would be nice if we could find some sources on the comparative remastering. Otherwise the claim in this article can reasonably be challenged and deleted, even tho I would doubt the Castle release could be "superior". / edg ☺ ☭ 18:34, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Track order for Never Say Die!

Especially since the additions to the first album were noted, the track listings on the back cover of the disc vs. the actual order on Never Say Die! appear to be quite wrong. Has anyone noted this anywhere? MSJapan (talk) 05:56, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Black Box: The Complete Original Black Sabbath (1970–1978). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050513225418/http://www.black-sabbath.com:80/discog/blackbox.html to http://www.black-sabbath.com/discog/blackbox.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:56, 3 November 2016 (UTC)