Talk:Akademgorodok

Russia: Science & education / Human geography High‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the science and education in Russia task force.
	This article is supported by the human geography of Russia task force.

Education Mid‑importance

	Education portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Map needed

It is requested that a map or maps be included in this article to improve its quality.
Wikipedians in Russia may be able to help!

Could somebody describe the climate? -- Error

I would imagine it's pretty much the same as in Novosibirsk. - Hephaestos

I've corrected the distance from Novosibirsk. It's only 20 km between the center of Novosibirsk and Akademgorodok. Also the population number is not correct. 100 000 is the population of the Soviet district of Novosibrisk (in which Akadem is included), but the pop. of Akadem itself is only 50-60 thousand. --80.66.89.202 08:04, 19 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect. Novosibirsk district population is much larger than 100,000 people. Novosibirsk city alone is over 1.5 million people. Novosibirsk Oblast is almost 2.7 million people. Also, you spelled 3rd instance of ' Novosibirsk ' wrong.--Atikokan (talk) 02:30, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Akademgorodok. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060219200719/http://www.iis.nsk.su/index_e.shtml to http://www.iis.nsk.su/index_e.shtml
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090519092719/http://www.niboch.nsc.ru/eng_index.html to http://www.niboch.nsc.ru/eng_index.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050403191515/http://uiggm.nsc.ru/engl/ to http://www.uiggm.nsc.ru/engl/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120716062438/http://hydro.nsc.ru/indexe.php to http://hydro.nsc.ru/indexe.php
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120617205202/http://du.academ.org/ to http://du.academ.org/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060901065556/http://foto.academ.org/ to http://foto.academ.org/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:44, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]