This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ice Hockey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of ice hockey on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ice HockeyWikipedia:WikiProject Ice HockeyTemplate:WikiProject Ice HockeyIce Hockey articles
It seems the claims that if people extrapolated Malone's 44 goals to a modern nhl season, his feat would have surpassed Gretzky. Now granted using this interpretation of calculating goals to games played would yeild such an interpretation. But this should have a reference. Because just as easily one could say he played 60 minutes in each of those games, and a more accurate comparison would be he played a maximum of 1200 minutes, and equating to modern statistics hed have 44 goals in 60 games in today's Nhl, assuming that he would play 20 minutes a game - all original research, I know but that is my issue. The current text is worded that way anyway. I think there must be some references out there that provide a fair view of interpreting older statistics so that they have meaning to today's hockey reader. I believe that would be helpful for this and other old time hockey player profiles 67.193.135.64 (talk) 22:13, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Support per page view analysis. A worthy primary, one of hockey's greats. Randy Kryn (talk) 19:48, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Hello! My name is GhostRiver, and I'll be conducting this GA review. I will assess the article against the good article criteria. Once I complete my review, you will have seven days to implement the suggested edits.
No stability concerns, and as the subject has been dead for over 50 years, there are unlikely to be
Photos are either public domain or CC and are relevant to the article
Per MOS:CAPTION, unless a caption is a full sentence, there should not be a period at the end of it
Add "|upright=yes" to the last two photos
GhostRiver, as the nominator appears to be inactive, if the article does not meet the GA criteria, I would recommend failing this review. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 17:25, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
