Talk:Okonomiyaki

Okonomiyaki has been listed as one of the Agriculture, food and drink good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: September 3, 2021. (Reviewed version).

Japan: Food and drink Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 02:58, April 28, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the Food and drink task force.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: Kako River (Japan)
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Pure Japanese, Vinland Saga (TV series), Japanese destroyer Ume (1944), Mai Fujisawa, Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Food and drink Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

Archives

1

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

ベトナムのお好み焼き.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:52, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Team-B-Vital Improvement Drive[edit]

Hello all!

This article has been chosen as this week's effort for WP:Discord's #team-b-vital channel, a collaborate effort to bring Stub and Start class Vital articles up to a B class if possible, similar to WP:Articles for Improvement. This effort will run for up to seven days, ending early if the article is felt to be at B-class or impossible to further improve. Articles are chosen by a quick vote among interested chatters, with the goal of working together on interesting Vital articles that need improving. This is the fourth article chosen and the final trial run for the effort.

Thank you! -- ferret (talk) 16:08, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Ferret: - Thanks for all the work by you, Lee Vilenski, TarkusAB, Goszei, Link20XX, Zoozaz1, Philoserf, and Bruce1ee. You all did a great job. I've gone through the article and fixed all the refs, add more refs for places that needed them, and expanded the article with a few more refs, too. The article is looking quite nice now. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 00:27, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No, thank you Nihonjoe - very good work. I'd like to take the article to GAN at some point, and with your additional edits, I think it's pretty close now. Do you have any thoughts on this? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 07:04, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Okonomiyaki/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: PinkElixir (talk · contribs) 20:41, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'll be taking on this review. Kind regards, PinkElixir (talk) 20:41, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	The prose is clear and concise. I made some minor grammar edits as I was reading through.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	The lead section appropriately summarizes the rest of the article. I might suggest adding some history to the Lead section to strengthen it even further.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.	All information is properly sourced. Great job finding such a wide array of sources! The references follow MOS:REFERENCES.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	All content is appropriately sourced using appropriate WP:RS.
	2c. it contains no original research.	There is no WP:OR.
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.	There are no signs of WP:PLAG or WP:CV.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.	The article focuses on relevant main aspects of the topic, including the dish's history and its variations across Japan. I might suggest adding a "preparation" section to outline how the dish is made. Many food articles on Wikipedia have such a section.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).	The article stays focused without adding unnecessary detail.
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.	The article follows NPOV.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.	There is no history of edit warring or content dispute on the article. On the contrary, the talk page discussion highlights great collaboration amongst multiple editors to improve the quality of this article.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	All images fall under the appropriate CC license or are editors' own work.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	Photographs used are relevant to the topic. Given the size of the article, perhaps 1 or 2 images can be removed without diminishing the article's quality.
	7. Overall assessment.	Y - this article passes GAN review! Please see my specific comments for some suggestions on further improvement. Otherwise, this is a solid article with valuable information, accurate sources. Great work! Done