Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jedi Temple Website

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. Postdlf 23:41, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Jedi Temple Website[edit]

A Star Wars fansite. It reads like advertising, and of course is far below the line of notability. Was speedy tagged but the creating user removed the tag, and added to the article. Hedley 20:39, 29 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

"Over 50 visits each day". Delete. Martg76 21:11, 29 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not notable, self-promotion. — Trilobite (Talk) 22:32, 29 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, think I. Non-notable and advertisement, it is gkhan 22:35, May 29, 2005 (UTC)
Delete. The Force is not with them. — Phil Welch 23:59, 29 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Self-promotion. K1Bond007 03:22, May 30, 2005 (UTC)
Delete. Self-promotion of a three week old, non-notable fansite. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 03:30, 30 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this and the image too. Nestea 11:42, 30 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep/Revamp. All it needs is a major revamp.SGCommand
Delete. We shouldn't even HAVE to vote. Let's have someone pull a Palpatine and bypass democracy, no? MJR
Revamp/Delete Perchaps we could make a single 'star wars websites' page or something. If not, delete it. The article is self-promotion. CaptainAmerica 02:58, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.