Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy/Proposals
 | This page is currently inactive and is retained for historical reference. Either the page is no longer relevant or consensus on its purpose has become unclear. To revive discussion, seek broader input via a forum such as the village pump. |
Proposals here are contingent on the passing of Wikipedia:Arbitration policy/Proposed amendment revote's Amendment E1.
This page shall be used to house proposed amendments to the arbitration policy. They are subject to the rules set out in the amendment section thereof.
Current proposals[edit]
Please use the /Template page contents to draft new proposals and add list them below.
Discussion[edit]
These proposals are being written and discussed. Input is welcome during this stage.
- /Evidence scope - regarding what evidence sources are appropriate for supporting a claim.
- /Deferring matters - regarding what should the committee do if it the matter is outside their jurisidiction.
- /Official mailing list - regarding whether the committee should have jurisdiction over the mailing list.
- /Removing legalese - to remove legalese from the Arbitration policy (but not to change the policy substantively).
- /Removing references to individual Wikipedians - to tidy up the policy by removing references to a couple of Wikipedians.
Preliminary poll[edit]
Final wording of these proposals is being considered. Successful proposals will move on to final voting.
- None currently
Final vote[edit]
Final voting is in progress for these proposals. Successful proposals will be incorporated into the Arbitration policy.
- None currently
Previous proposals[edit]
none at present