Talk:Pressure system

Pressure system has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
November 27, 2010	Good article nominee	Listed

Weather: General Mid‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the General meteorology task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Constant pressure charts[edit]

Some explanation would be useful of the charts of pressure that are available at 850, 700, 500 and 250 hPa and how they vary from sea-level charts. JMcC 13:27, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

High pressure in equator[edit]

There no explained about what happened in equator line. about high and low pressure in equator line.Daimond (talk) 13:41, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Highest?[edit]

Article graciously provides us with the lowest pressure, but what is the highest measured? Said: Rursus (☻) 11:14, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pressure systems on weather maps[edit]

Check last sentence, where it say wikipedia is wrong about everything. Pedrojoper (talk) 13:57, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Significant expansion and revamping[edit]

There was much missing within this article previously. Now, it's in much better shape. Once the low pressure area section is fully referenced, we can upgrade the article to C class. Thegreatdr (talk) 16:17, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Pressure system/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Disambiguation check: Done

Checklinks: 4 dead (Ref #'s 5, 10, 25, 19) Fixed

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Prose is very good. Only one issue while reading, under Low pressure system in first paragraph a closing parentheses seems to be missing:

...within the Westerlies (a trough with large wavelength which extends through the (troposphere).

Fixed

Fix this and the dead links and I'll pass the article.

Reviewer: Lvi56 (talk) 05:39, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Found/replaced 3 of the 4 dead links. As it turns out, former ref 10 wasn't necessary as the other refs, particularly the one now at #10, described it well enough on their own. The parenthesis problem has been fixed. Thegreatdr (talk) 06:08, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good. I went ahead and fixed the red link that was under the High pressure section. I'll pass the article, good work!Lvi56 (talk) 06:39, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What is the plain meaning of this sentence?[edit]

Try as I may, I cannot understand the point of the last sentence of the third introductory paragraph: "Tropical cyclones can form during any month of the year globally, but can occur in either the northern hemisphere or the southern hemisphere during November.[11]" The sentence appears to be trying to make a contrast, but since the northern and southern hemispheres combined constitute the entire surface of the earth, which is the same as "globally," nothing is being contrasted. In plain English, what is this sentence trying to say? Wikifan2744 (talk) 06:22, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Pressure system. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:03, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Pressure system. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:58, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]