Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/M.O.P.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - found to be a copyvio - SimonP 04:28, May 13, 2005 (UTC)
M.O.P.[edit]
The page M.O.P has the same subject as M.O.P. (with a dot on the end), but is more Wikipedia-style. Altough it has less text (measured in words), it is more informative. The text of the page that is voted for, for deletion also seems to be copied from a other source, but I haven't verified that.
- Merge the two articles and make one a redirect, if copyvio concerns are cleared up. The submitter is right--M.O.P. (with the period) feels like copy that came from somewhere else, but a cursory Googling doesn't locate it. I don't know what the correct name for the merged article should be. Does the period belong or not? --TenOfAllTrades (talk/contrib) 20:03, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Comment: forget VFD. This article is a copyright violation. The text is lifted directly from here. Please remove the VfD tag and replace it with a copyright violation tag. Kingturtle 20:44, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Done. Any user can add a copyvio tag, by the way—there are instructions for the process at Wikipedia:Copyright problems. --TenOfAllTrades (talk/contrib) 21:21, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, copyright violation. Megan1967 04:29, 1 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and Redirect to M.O.P N-Mantalk 20:59, 1 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.