Talk:Surface marker buoy

	Transport portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Transport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TransportWikipedia:WikiProject TransportTemplate:WikiProject TransportTransport articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Maritime task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Scuba diving C‑class Mid‑importance

	Underwater diving portal This article is part of WikiProject Underwater diving, an effort to create, expand, organize, and improve Underwater diving-related articles to a feature-quality standard, and to comprehensively cover the topic with quality encyclopedic articles.Scuba divingWikipedia:WikiProject Scuba divingTemplate:WikiProject Scuba divingSCUBA articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

copyedit[edit]

I took a cut at copyediting this article. The bulleted style seemed very awkward to me, so I made real sentences. I'm in no position to fact-check, though; hopefully, I've not introduced any errors. -- Mikeblas 19:43, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merging[edit]

I've added tags suggesting that Decompression buoy and Lifting bag be merged into this article. I think given the small size and common content of these articles, they'd be better in the one umbrella article, and that "Surface Marker Buoy" would be the most appropriate title for such an article. There would then be sections for non-deployable SMBs (the current focus of this article), deployable SMBs (Decompression buoys) and lift bags. Lift bags could possibly be left out, as they do serve a significantly different purpose to SMBs, but given that lift bags are often used as DSMBs and manufacturers certainly treat lift bags and DSMBs as part of the same product family, I think it could justifiably be merged in. If anyone else has any thoughts on the matter, please comment here. David Scarlett 13:06, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'd suggest a merge and redirect, it does seem silly to have two pages but a redirect is a good thing (tm) -- Tawker 06:22, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Surface marker buoy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070715064701/http://www.vbs.vt.edu/scuba/Safety/SafeSaus.html to http://www.vbs.vt.edu/scuba/Safety/SafeSaus.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:26, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge with redirect.[edit]

The content of Dive-float is a small subset of the existing topic of the article Surface marker buoy, which is a more widely used term for the same class of object. There are also some inaccuracies which need to be fixed - it is not a standardised item, as there are several kinds of dive-float/surface marker buoy in use around the world. The pictured item is more commonly known as a torpedo buoy or rescue buoy. This form of float may also be towed by freedivers when spearfishing. I propose to merge the content of Dive-float into Surface marker buoy with redirect before making corrections and clarification. · · · Peter Southwood ^(talk): 09:44, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion[edit]

Do it, Peter. Sensible consolidation of a single topic. --RexxS (talk) 15:50, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Done, cleaning up. · · · Peter Southwood ^(talk): 09:24, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Point of order, RexxS, Pbsouthwood, don't these discussion usually run for more than just one day? Geo Swan (talk) 05:21, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Geo Swan: they often do, but there's no fixed rule. Unfortunately, there are often very few contributors to scuba-related discussions, so once a couple of use agree, there's usually little point in waiting. Nevertheless, the changes can always be rolled back if there's any cogent reason to. If you have an actual (rather than procedural) objection, I'm sure both Peter and I would be delighted to discuss it with you. Have a look at the content of Dive float prior to merger to see why we both thought it an obvious merge. Cheers --RexxS (talk) 19:46, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Geo Swan: I agree with everything RexxS said. I generally leave the discussion open for a week if there is no comment, but will take action sooner if there is strong agreement and no objection, and this is a very obvious situation where the term is a synonym/subset of an existing topic, albeit a somewhat less common or regional usage. I am always happy to have a constructive discussion on any diving topic. Cheers, · · · Peter Southwood ^(talk): 05:49, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]