Talk:Robert Adams (photographer)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

No approach to photography can be neutral. I need to craft an edit to this.

Added Image[edit]

The page looked decidedly barren, and so I added an example of his work. However, I do not know the copyright status, and if it is indeed prohibited, please do remove it. Vegasrebel29 08:57, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]


hi! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.179.66.162 (talk) 12:21, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 03:46, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

References[edit]

This article has been heavily worked on by conflict of interest editors. It has only ONE reliable third party reference. It reads like a promo piece by his gallery.TeapotgeorgeTalk 17:41, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It is hard to find information about Robert Adams, but all of the information in the article is neutral facts, sourced from as large a variety of resources as is available online: Art 21, the Getty Museum, Hasselblad foundation, and the Yale Art Gallery (all non-profit institutions). Typhood (talk) 20:42, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

These are NOT reliable secondary sources, they are primary sources with an association with AdamsTeapotgeorgeTalk 07:41, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of Interest?[edit]

Please cite evidence of COI re Afterimage1839 and Robert Adams. Are you just making an assumption or do you have evidence? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Afterimage1839 (talkcontribs) 14:33, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Source[edit]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Robert Adams (photographer). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:43, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]