Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marriage obsolescence

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was RESULT. DELETE Rich Farmbrough 02:45, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Marriage obsolescence

Marriage obsolescence is some event that may occur in the future. This reads like original research, the exact phrase gets zero google hits--nixie 02:34, 7 Mar 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. I concur, sounds like original research. may occur in the future ... Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Android79 04:14, Mar 7, 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect to Annulment. Megan1967 05:52, 7 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Original research, at the very least.--Pharos 06:06, 7 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Original research. Eric119 16:33, 7 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, no redirect. This has nothing to do with annulment. Rossami (talk) 20:28, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, other articles on Wikipedia that speculate the future are kept (e.g. End of the world); it poses a similar concept like marriage obsolescence would. Wikipedia is already a crystal ball to a certain degree; also, I have seen episodes of Forensic Files on Court TV, they also pose as a precursor to marriage obsolescence. --GoofyGuy 19:17, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • This article is active speculation, that is, original research; articles like End of the world are articles about belief systems that already exist, and have existed for some time. I'm not sure what you mean about the CourtTV show. Precedent exists for deletion of crystal-ball-like articles, like not-yet-released video games. Android79 19:46, Mar 10, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, more speculation from User:SamuraiClinton (goofyguy above). This user has written many articles which are on VfD now. Rhobite 02:47, Mar 11, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - David Gerard 11:02, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Original speculation. Jayjg ^(talk) 17:31, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Crackpot philosophy? Technically "original research" I guess. Fawcett5 02:29, 12 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• With sources, this could make an article, but with no sources and no internet hits, i would have to say Delete. Bonus Onus 19:56, Mar 12, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.