Talk:HMS Duke of Wellington (1852)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Military history: Maritime / British / European

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force

Great article! :o)

note to self: Sent for permission for a splendid pic, don't forget to add it Pedant

Archaeological investigation[edit]

I'm just watching a feature on the BBC about the investigation of the Wellington's remains, and how they were identified. I would imagine that for those who know how, there is a wealth of further information available in relation to that. HTH HAND —Phil | Talk 19:58, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Beatty edit[edit]

I removed the uncited claim that David Beatty commanded this ship in 1900-02, but without signing in. His service records and the fine article on WP show he was recovering from wounds in 1900-02 and saw no service between appointments in Juno and Arrogant. DulcetTone (talk) 17:06, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]