Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/American Nihilist Underground Society

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Has anyone noticed that the user leigh has an strangely ferverent desire to remove anus.com from wikipedia? It is almost as if it has been taken to a personal level.... --Iconoclast 20:04, 16 Jan 2005 (UTC)

oh, k --Iconoclast 06:53, 17 Jan 2005 (UTC)

  • Hello, I'm just curious, leigh, but in the Village Pump page, you said that you supported the anus.com article. A few questions: why did you not vote for it in the correct page, and why did you have a crusade to check to see if individuals who wanted to keep it had the subjective credentials appropriate for voting? I know it is the proper thing to do (and I would have done the same thing If I was in your position) but I'm just curious. I too would like to be an admin or moderator of this fine website; so I suppose one must cast votes in the 'correct' place to be nominated? I must keep this in mind, then, as I too would like to make this community a better place. --Iconoclast 09:06, 17 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • My apologies, I noticed you voted to keep a small article on anus.com. Perhaps more database room can be given to Shoggoth, a much much much more notable thing. --Iconoclast 09:13, 17 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • -leigh (φθόγγος) said: "I don't want Wikipedia to become an advertisement"... American Nihilist Underground Society is not a commercial enterprise. How do you consider it to be advertising? There are MANY other wiki articles about far less deserving topics. I could provide an ample list of such articles, although I am not going to go down that pedantic road. Maybe this goes to show the deletion of the American Nihilist Underground Society article is also a pedantic exercise? PyrE (talk) 02:13, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Dude where did the article go?[edit]

I don't think it is fair and it is done in poor judgement to delete an article preemptively while a VFD is taking place. Is this precedent? I think not. While I agree that the "uncouths" have done bad things I don't think that we should chance precedent just to anger them. --Iconoclast 06:53, 17 Jan 2005 (UTC)