Talk:Troy Hurtubise

	; Archives (Index) ;
	1;
	This page is archived by ClueBot III.

This article was nominated for deletion on 8 April 2021. The result of the discussion was keep.

Skip to table of contents

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Troy Hurtubise article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Biography: Arts and Entertainment / Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Skepticism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Canada: Ontario Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ontario portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ontario.

Invention

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Invention, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Invention on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InventionWikipedia:WikiProject InventionTemplate:WikiProject InventionInvention articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Merge from Trojan Ballistics Suit of Armor[edit]

From my comments at that AfD: I've added another cite [to Trojan Ballistics Suit of Armor], and although this technically meets the threshold for multiple independent sources, they are not substantial or in-depth enough to cover the subject to the level of depth the article goes, raising issues of WP:NOR. The inventor is certainly notable enough for the media coverage of his exploits, and the section in [this] article can be expanded with the WP:V content from [that] article. The effort needed to clean up [that] article would be better spent cleaning up [this] one. If the suit becomes sufficiently notable later, the content can always be split out again. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dhaluza (talk • contribs) 11:56, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Angel Light[edit]

This section should be removed. It's written as if these claims are actually rational in someway. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.147.211.226 (talk) 20:57, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Is that self-reference? ;)BorkBorkGoesTheCode (talk) 09:53, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

no bork, obviously not (this) section on the talk page, the section "Angel Light" on the article page.

Hurtubise made his claims about his "Angel Light" invention a dozen years ago, and there's no evidence that supports them. However, since much of the article is attributable to the subject (i.e. claims made by Hurtubise himself), it is might be worthwhile (for a neutral point of view) to include some of his more improbable claims along with a note that they are unproven (or unfounded). So basically like:

 ==Invention X== 
 On (date), Hurtubise revealed he had made Invention X which he claims can do Y. <ref>Hurtubise, whatever media interviewed him/published his press release)</ref> There is no evidence to date that Invention X actually can actually do Y, and Skeptic Z doesn't believe it can.<ref>Skeptic Z, whatever media interviewed/published Skeptic Z</ref>

Stating Hurtubise's claims like they are facts makes the article biased since the source is biased, but if it is a fact that he made said claims and making such claims is noteworthy in itself, then it's ok for it to be included in the article. However, since Hurtubise's claims are generally pseudoscientific it is important to note that they are not supported by actual evidence. The best way is to cite a reliable source who says as much, but because mainstream scientists are often likely to just ignore pseudoscientific claims it might be hard to find a reference. If that's the case then just stating "Hurtubise claims about his invention have not been confirmed by the mainstream scientific community and there have been no peer-reviewed scientific articles published that support his testimonials to the media." Even without citing a specific source this wouldn't be original research because it is attributable to the reliable, published sources that are scientific journals' indexes/archives, and even if it might take some time it would be verifiable. --IPEditor (talk) 18:40, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]