User talk:Neanderthalprimadonna

Hope you enjoy contributing to Wikipedia. Be bold in editing pages. Here are some links that you might find useful:

Try the Tutorial. If you have less time, try Wikipedia:How to edit a page.
To sign your posts (on talk pages, Articles for deletion page etc.) use ~~~~ (four tildes). This will insert your name and timestamp. To insert just your name, type ~~~ (3 tildes).
You can experiment in the test area.
You can get help at the Help Desk
Some other pages that will help you know more about Wikipedia: Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, Wikipedia:Civility, Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not
If you made IP edits before creating a user account, you can attribute your IP edits to your account at Wikipedia:Changing attribution for an edit.

I hope you stick around and keep contributing to Wikipedia. Drop a note at Wikipedia:New user log.

Get your facts right before you edit[edit]

Hi, I just noticed that you made some changes on Tahoe. You said that "South Lake Tahoe" is the largest city in Tahoe. i think you're a little mixed up here. The name of the city is Statline, named because the statline runs through it. It just happens to be in South lake Tahoe. South lake Tahoe is just a region. Nothing personal, I was just working on the article, and saw you made some changes which were factualy incorect. Please check your facts before you edit in the future. Tobyk777 03:44, 3 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Well it looks like your right. Sotuh Lake Tahoe is a city as well as a region, sorry about that one, however, it is not the largest city in Tahoe, statlline is. Looks like we were both right and both wrong, (about diffrent things) Sorry about the whole mix up. Tobyk777 03:17, 4 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- You just proved your point. You were right on everything. Thanks for staighting me up on that. Sorry if I caused you any problems. 03:03, 5 October 2005 (UTC)

on the tre arrow page, i changed the charge to arson.04:56, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

Record label external links[edit]

Thanks for your message. I removed the ex. links on the page List of record labels starting with D because none of the other links on that page has an external link to the label. Same for A through to Z too. You're more than welcome to create a full article for that label and to include an external link from that. Lugnuts 09:40, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, you're wrong. Look at this. Lugnuts 14:36, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Jesus wept - are you still banging on about this?! In the time it's taken you to moan on about it, you could of created the article in question! Haha. Lugnuts 13:11, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - too obscure to warrant articles, but OK to link to some website? Hmmmm... Lugnuts 14:14, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    - Because only 1 of them is likely to get deleted. BAM!! Lugnuts 18:21, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tuff Turf[edit]

A "{{prod}}" template has been added to the article Tuff Turf, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but yours may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Whs itc hy 03:22, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Satan Jokers[edit]

A tag has been placed on Satan Jokers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. tomasz. 11:41, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Bill Metoyer[edit]

A tag has been placed on Bill Metoyer requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hammer1980·^talk 23:11, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Obamaism[edit]

A tag has been placed on Obamaism requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Raven1977 (talk) 04:23, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

USS Missouri[edit]

I just noticed that you made an edit with new information to USS Missouri (BB-63) that lacked an appropriate citation. Please revisit this edit and source it properly, because the article is a Featured article, there should not be any unreferenced information in the article and I do not intend to let the information stand in the article uncited for long. -MBK₀₀₄ 22:10, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RfD nomination of Obamaism[edit]

Unreferenced BLPs[edit]

Hello Neanderthalprimadonna! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 3 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 951 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Aynsley Dunbar - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Glynnis O'Connor - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Alan Fitzgerald - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 01:50, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Rocky Pamplin, University of Oregon Football.jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Rocky Pamplin, University of Oregon Football.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. [1], and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
add the relevant copyright tag.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:51, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Neanderthalprimadonna. You have new messages at Malik Shabazz's talk page.
Message added 01:20, 22 June 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Neanderthalprimadonna. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]