Talk:Corporate America (album)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Rock music Low‑importance

	Rock music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rock musicWikipedia:WikiProject Rock musicTemplate:WikiProject Rock musicRock music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move 22 May 2024[edit]

It has been proposed in this section that multiple pages be renamed and moved.

A bot will list this discussion on requested moves' current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil.

Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly.

Links: current log • target log • direct move

– No other article with the title "Corporate America" other than a disambiguation page. An actual article should be the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Mika1h (talk) 16:42, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose WP:GNG is not met by the article. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 11:31, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - most likely the album doesn't meet GNG, at best though this is clearly a WP:NOPRIMARY. estar8806 (talk) ★ 16:37, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - @Zxcvbnm:@Estar8806: I added more reviews to the article. I think it passes GNG now. --Mika1h (talk) 23:36, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, this is a charting album by a major band. Much like video games, it simply suffers from its sources being locked away in print media because it released in the early 2000s. There's no way this fails an AFD or a merge discussion, we should concentrate on a path forward with it existing instead. Sergecross73 msg me 14:28, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support but delete the disambiguation page as an invalid page: there's no article. Use some sort of hatnote from the album article to Economy of the United States.Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:03, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per WikiNav clickstream data for April 2024. Out of 220 outgoing views from the dab, Corporation gets 72, Big business 64, Corporate America (album) 54, and Economy of the United States 30. None of those received more than 50% of the outgoing views in March 2024, either. If there's a primary topic, the album isn't it. (For completeness, there are about 1.2k incoming views to the dab, 998 of them from search engines. We can't conclude from WikiNav data alone what happened to the other ~1k views that didn't click through to an article from the dab.) Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 17:39, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And not one of those bluelinks even mentions the phrase Corporate America. That faux-dab page is a real disservice to those readers. Station1 (talk) 05:06, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I've added a mention to Big business. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 12:14, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. There is no other article that even mentions Corporate America, much less would use the title. The so-called dab page breaks all the rules and should be deleted. Station1 (talk) 05:06, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]